Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Development of Chemical Methods to Assess the Bioavailability of Arsenic in Contaminated Media

EPA Grant Number: R825410
Title: Development of Chemical Methods to Assess the Bioavailability of Arsenic in Contaminated Media
Investigators: Basta, Nicholas T. , Rodriguez, Robin R. , Casteel, Stan W.
Institution: Oklahoma State University , University of Missouri - Columbia
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: November 1, 1996 through October 31, 1999 (Extended to October 31, 2000)
Project Amount: $431,677
RFA: Environmental Fate and Treatment of Toxics and Hazardous Wastes (1996) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Hazardous Waste/Remediation , Safer Chemicals , Land and Waste Management

Description:

Soil ingestion from incidental hand-to-mouth activity by children is an important issue in assessing public health risks associated with exposure to As-contaminated soils and media. Risk from enteric bioavailability of As is difficult to assess because As exists in many geochemical forms (e.g., oxides, sulfides) and physical forms (flue dust, slag, tailings, waste ore) at hazardous waste sites contaminated by mining or smelting of ore. The purpose of the proposed research is to determine the ability of chemical methods (chemical speciation, in-vitro gastrointestinal) to provide a reasonable estimate of As bioavailability in contaminated media and provide rapid and inexpensive information to characterize risk at Superfund sites. In this study, As measured by chemical methods (chemical speciation and in-vitro gastrointestinal methods) will be compared with As uptake by immature pigs for contaminated media (soil and slag) collected from a mining, milling, and smelter site.

Benefits expected from the proposed research include inexpensive methodologies to obtain site-specific bioavailability thereby lowering the degree of uncertainty in risk assessment. Rapid, inexpensive testing methods will provide scientifically derived data to select appropriate remedies at these sites which are cost-effective and protective of human health and the environment. An accurate site-specific bioavailability method may be a useful tool to evaluate the effectiveness of remediation technologies and determine remediation endpoints.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 20 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 1 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

Health, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Waste, Water, Susceptibility/Sensitive Population/Genetic Susceptibility, Fate & Transport, Risk Assessments, Chemistry, genetic susceptability, Environmental Chemistry, Contaminated Sediments, Epidemiology, Arsenic, Children's Health, Bioavailability, health effects, toxicity, arsenic mobility, contaminant transport, contaminated sediment, kinetic studies, mining impacted watershed, contaminated mines, ingestion, risk assessment, adverse human health affects, human exposure, dermal contact, chemical contaminants, fate, risk characterization, soil sediment, soils, animal research, sediment transport, hazardous waste, children, fate and transport, ecology assessment models, transport contaminants, chronic health effects, hazardous waste sites, environmental toxicant, superfund site, chemical speciation, human health effects, soil ingestion, exposure assessment, mobility, arsenic exposure

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 1997 Progress Report
  • 1998 Progress Report
  • 1999 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 1999 Progress Report
    • 1998 Progress Report
    • 1997 Progress Report
    20 publications for this project
    1 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.