Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Alternative Urbanization Scenarios for an Agricultural Watershed: Design Criteria, Social Constraints, and Effects on Groundwater and Surface Water Systems

EPA Grant Number: R828010
Title: Alternative Urbanization Scenarios for an Agricultural Watershed: Design Criteria, Social Constraints, and Effects on Groundwater and Surface Water Systems
Investigators: Lathrop, Richard C. , LaGro Jr., James A. , Nelsoni, Edward B. , Zedler, Joy B. , Bahr, Jean M. , Bradbury, Kenneth R. , Greb, Steven R. , Potter, Kenneth W. , Nowak, Peter
Institution: University of Wisconsin - Madison , Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: January 15, 2000 through January 14, 2003
Project Amount: $886,105
RFA: Water and Watersheds (1999) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Watersheds , Water

Description:

Agricultural landscapes are being urbanized throughout the United States, resulting in the degradation of aquatic systems. Fundamental changes in watershed hydrology result from the construction of impervious surfaces (roofs, streets, sidewalks). As impervious surface area expands, runoff peaks and volumes increase, and water quality and groundwater levels decline. Increased runoff peaks cause channel erosion and habitat degradation. Increased erosion of soil and associated nutrients cause sedimentation and eutrophication of lakes and wetlands. Diminished groundwater levels desiccate wetlands and reduce the discharge of high quality groundwater to springs, streams, and lakes. Wetland bio-diversity declines. These hydrologic and ecological impacts of urbanization are exacerbated in regions where groundwater is pumped for domestic use and irrigation.

Objectives: We propose to evaluate alternative management practices and patterns of urbanization by considering a range of urban development issues, including storm runoff, groundwater depletion, wastewater treatment, eutrophication, and wetland degradation. We will also address the interaction among these issues and the social and political opportunities for, and constraints on, effective management. Our goal is to fill critical knowledge gaps and extend (or develop) analytical and modeling tools that will minimize the hydrologic and ecological impacts of urbanization.

Approach:

We will apply this new knowledge and our enhanced modeling tools to a case study of the North Fork of Pheasant Branch near Madison, Wisconsin. An abundance of data, several ongoing research projects, and a high level of public interest make this an excellent research site. We will construct comparable land use/water management scenarios for this watershed, including "low-impact development" designs, and evaluate their approximate economic costs, social/political acceptability, and hydrologic and ecological impacts. We will use extant groundwater and surface water models calibrated for the region and structurally modified by the research team to correctly simulate the infiltration practices, thermal pollution, well locations and pumping schedules, and wastewater treatment options. We will examine urban impacts on wetlands, especially their bio-diversity, and determine which native species can thrive in constructed urban bio-retention wetlands. We will evaluate farmer behaviors needed to reduce high soil P concentrations in agricultural lands that are likely to be converted to urban development. We will model water clarity and algal bloom responses to scenarios of P loading changes downstream in Lake Mendota. Finally, we will evaluate the social and institutional barriers to low-impact development through interviews and focus groups with engineers, planners, homeowners and other key players.

Expected Results:

This multi-disciplinary research will allow us to make recommendations that should help local governments and citizen groups improve the management and protection of critical aquatic resources in rapidly urbanizing landscapes.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 72 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 18 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

RFA, Scientific Discipline, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Geographic Area, Water, Ecological Risk Assessment, State, Watersheds, Environmental Chemistry, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Nutrients, Wet Weather Flows, Water & Watershed, Environmental Engineering, agriculture , eutrophication of lakes, thermal pollution, ecological effects, biodiversity, water quality, urbanization, environmental monitoring, aquatic ecosystem, pump stations, urban development, alternative urbanization scenarios, streams, fate and transport, eutrophication, aquatic degradation, phosphorous, groundwater, irrigation, aquatic biota, ecological exposure, land use, storm water, channel erosion, social constraints, agriculture, nutrient transport, land management, impervious surface areas, Wisconsin (WI), well location, agricultural watershed, aquatic ecosystems, nutrient cycling, stream ecosystem, runoff, surface water

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2000 Progress Report
  • 2001 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2001 Progress Report
    • 2000 Progress Report
    72 publications for this project
    18 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.