Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2000 Progress Report: The Particle Size Distribution of Toxicity in Metal-Contaminated Sediments

EPA Grant Number: R826651
Title: The Particle Size Distribution of Toxicity in Metal-Contaminated Sediments
Investigators: Ranville, James , Clements, William , Macalady, Donald L. , Ross, Phillipe
Institution: Colorado School of Mines
Current Institution: Colorado School of Mines , Colorado State University
EPA Project Officer: Aja, Hayley
Project Period: October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2001 (Extended to September 30, 2002)
Project Period Covered by this Report: October 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000
Project Amount: $372,795
RFA: Exploratory Research - Environmental Chemistry (1998) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Sustainable and Healthy Communities , Land and Waste Management , Air , Safer Chemicals

Objective:

The overall project objective is to determine whether significant improvement in predicting ecosystem risk can be obtained by applying current test methods for metal-contaminated sediments to size-fractionated sediments. The major hypothesis of the work is that the size distribution of acid-extractable metals will significantly affect both organism exposure to, and toxicity of, oxic metal-contaminated sediments. The size distribution of metal sorbing phases, such as organic matter or oxides, also may influence exposure. This hypothesis depends largely on two assumptions. First, in some cases dietary routes of exposure dominate over dissolved metal exposure, and second, sediment composition varies with particle size. Due to the influence of specific surface area on metal sorption, particle size could still play a major role when dissolved metal exposure is the more important process.

Progress Summary:

Sediment Characterization. We are examining sediments from streams that have been impacted by historical mining of metal
sulfide ores. The current field site is located on the North Fork of Clear Creek, located in the Front Range of Colorado.
Sediments are dominated by iron oxyhydroxide precipitates, which form during the neutralization of low-pH, metal-rich tailings
and mine effluents. A number of toxic metals are associated with the sediments as a result of sorption and coprecipitation. The
size distribution of trace metal content may be important if size-selective feeding by benthic and water-column organisms
occurs. Furthermore, both sediment transport and surface-area dependant reactions such as sorption and dissolution depend
on particle size. We have been using traditional (sieving and sedimentation) and newly-developed (SPLITT) methods to size
fractionate sediments prior to chemical analysis. An example of the affect of particle size on trace metal composition of a Clear
Creek sediment that was fractionated by traditional methods is given in Table 1. Results demonstrate that significant variations
in sediment composition occur among the different size classes.

Toxicity Testing. Toxicity tests are being performed that have been designed to examine the relative importance of dietary
exposure versus exposure to dissolved metals. Two approaches to this are being taken. One approach to control the relative
amount of exposure to dissolved versus sediment-associated metals is to examine different pH conditions. By increasing pH,
dissolved metals concentrations are reduced by sorption and precipitation reactions. Thus, by comparing experiments with
sediment suspensions performed at low and high pH, the degree of dissolved metals can be varied while sediment metal
concentrations are constant.

Table 1. Size dependence of element composition of Clear Creek suspended sediments

Element

<5 micron

5-25 micron

>25micron

Average

Std. Dev.

Average

Std. Dev.

Average

Std. Dev.

ppm (mg/kg) (from 3 reps.) ppm (mg/kg) (from 3 reps.) ppm (mg/kg) (from 3 reps.)
Al 27300 300 21100 920 28200 1700
Cd 37 0 20 1 30 1
Cr 49 10 50 2 80 2
Cu 1500 20 790 30 860 40
Fe 85700 1700 59000 2260 68500 3400
Mn 4100 50 3010 120 5500 100
Ni 460 410 100 2 270 180
Pb 540 10 310 9 250 10
Si 5840 120 5500 450 5070 120
Zn 8030 90 3810 170 3600 190
S 24500 1940 27000 1820 65250 1130

Another approach is to compare toxicity of water samples that contain sediments to ones that have had the sediments removed.
Assuming the waters are in equilibrium with the sediments, the amount of dissolved metals will be the same in both cases, but in
one case sediment-associated metals also are available to the organisms. An example of such an experiment, using Daphnia
magna, is shown in Table 2. It is clear that greater toxicity occurs when sediments are present, which demonstrates the
importance of a dietary route of metal exposure.

Table 2. Toxicity results for Daphnia magna using an undiluted and a 10:1 dilution of a suspension of North Fork
sediments

Duration of Toxicity Tests 24 hours 48 hours 24 hours 48 hours
With sediment Without sediment
North Fork Water Sample # inactive (of 15) 6 11 0 7
% effect 40 73 0 47
10:1 Dilution # inactive (of 15) 2 10 0 5
% effect 13 67 0 33
DI Water Control # inactive (of 30) 1 3  
% effect 3 10  

Sublethal effects of metals also are being examined. For example, the effect of sediment metal concentrations on the growth of
benthic organisms is being studied. Table 3 and Figure 1 show sediment metal concentrations and their effect on survival and
growth of Chironomous tentans for a 10-day experiment where contaminated North Fork sediments were mixed with
uncontaminated Poudre River sediments. Decreases in both survival and weight gain are seen with increasing sediment metal
concentrations.

Size Fractionation Method Development. Future toxicity experiments will focus on size-fractionated sediments. Both
traditional and newly developed methods of preparative-scale size fractionation will be used to prepare these fractions.
Therefore, a method is needed to analyze the size distributions within each size fraction. Furthermore, we wish to characterize
the distribution of metals in these size fractions.

Table 3. Metal concentrations in North Fork sediment, Poudre River sediment, and mixture of the two sediments

Metal Concentration (mg/kg sediment)
Poudre River Sediment North Fork Sediment Mixture
Fe 8,500 71,000 23,000
Mn 100 1,200 400
Al 4,400 16,000 6,400
Zn 80 2,300 660
Cu 10 600 160
Pb BDL 210 50

Figure 1. Effect of sediment zinc and copper concentration on survival and weight gain of chironomid tentans

Figure 1.

Field-flow fractionation (FFF) methods are being developed that can provide high resolution size analysis and fractionation of
the sediments. Coupling FFF directly to ICP-AES provided the information on metal distributions that will assist in the
interpretation of toxicity data. Figure 2 shows the results for the FFF analysis of a mixture of spherical polystyrene standards
and a standard clay sample. A UV detector is used to determine the approximate mass of particles eluting from the FFF versus
time. Addition of an online single particle counter provides additional characterization for the sediments. In future work, we will
couple ICP to the FFF to examine the size distribution of metal content of the sediments. The resulting characterization will be
used to interpret sediment toxicity test results.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Future Activities:

Current standard sediment toxicity test methods require considerable amounts of sediment. Given that the size fractionation methods may produce insufficient quantities for standard test, we are developing methods that require less sediment mass. We are beginning experiments with size fractionated sediments and are including a greater number of species in the toxicity tests. Additional field sites are being investigated to expand the scope of the study.

Journal Articles:

No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 14 publications for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

sediments, bioavailability, heavy metals, aquatic, environmental chemistry., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Air, Waste, Water, Geographic Area, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Bioavailability, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Ecosystem Protection, Contaminated Sediments, Environmental Chemistry, Chemistry, Fate & Transport, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, Biology, Ecological Indicators, EPA Region, fate and transport, ecological exposure, ecosystem modeling, particle size, sediment contaminant effects, acid volatile sulfide, sediment toxicity, contaminated sediment, ecological modeling, sediment, exposure, chemical composition, metal contaminated sediment, simultaneously extracted metals, Region 8, flourescent bacteria, ecological risk, benthic macroinvertebrates, heavy metal contamination, exposure assessment

Progress and Final Reports:

Original Abstract
  • 1999
  • 2001
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2001
    • 1999
    • Original Abstract
    14 publications for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.