Grantee Research Project Results
Are Genetic Diversity and Genetic Differentiation Bioindicators of Contaminant Impact on Natural Populations? Fundulus heteroclitus as a Model Estuarine Species
EPA Grant Number: R826593Title: Are Genetic Diversity and Genetic Differentiation Bioindicators of Contaminant Impact on Natural Populations? Fundulus heteroclitus as a Model Estuarine Species
Investigators: Newman, Michael C. , Mulvey, Margaret , Unger, Michael A. , Vogelbein, Wolfgang K.
Institution: Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Current Institution: Virginia Institute of Marine Science , College of William and Mary-VA
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2001 (Extended to September 30, 2003)
Project Amount: $727,255
RFA: Ecological Indicators (1998) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Aquatic Ecosystems , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration
Description:
Molecular genetic traits of the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, will be evaluated as bioindicators of population-level effects of pollution by testing seven hypotheses: 1. Populations residing in contaminated habitats are genetically distinct from populations in neighboring, clean sites. 2. Populations at polluted sites exhibit lower than expected genetic variability. 3. Genetic structure over a landscape reflects the mosaic of polluted and clean habitat. 4. Populations at contaminated sites display tolerance to local contaminants. 5. Populations at polluted sites are locally adapted and persistent, and are not replenished by recurrent migration from nearby clean sites. 6. Tolerant populations exhibit suboptimal performance for fitness-related traits when reared in clean habitat, indicative of a "cost" of tolerance. 7. Performance of individuals and populations is related to genetic variation and lower variation is associated with poor measures of fitness.
Improvement to Risk Assessment: Although population viability is often an implied endpoint in ecological risk assessments, directly relevant information is difficult to obtain. Consequently, risk assessments rely heavily on effects to individuals and extrapolate from these to imply consequences to populations. Application of molecular bioindicators for population effects will be demonstrated across a landscape feature, the Elizabeth River. Such bioindicators will be valuable to document contaminant impact before and to monitor recovery after remediation.
Approach:
To test hypotheses 1-3 and 5, surveys will be conducted at clean and polluted sites. To test hypotheses 4 and 6, fish will be obtained from clean and polluted sites, and reciprocally reared in clean and polluted mesocosms. Embryo, juvenile, and adult performance will be measured. Endpoints will include terata, growth, fecundity, age at maturity, lesions, condition index, and mortality. Hypothesis 7 will be tested by challenging populations representing clean and polluted sites with a highly pathogenic biovar of Vibrio anguillarum. Allozyme and DNA diversity will be determined in the above studies.
Expected Results:
This study will provide environmental managers with a better understanding of how chronic exposure of natural populations to contaminants can alter genetic variability, population structure, and toxicant tolerance in local populations, and how they relate to organism health. The potential use of allozyme and DNA genetic diversity as a biomarker of population impact of pollution will be demonstrated.
Publications and Presentations:
Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 13 publications for this projectJournal Articles:
Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 4 journal articles for this projectSupplemental Keywords:
effects, indicators, aquatic, genetics, EMAP, Chesapeake Bay., RFA, Health, Geographic Area, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Ecosystem Protection, exploratory research environmental biology, Risk Assessments, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Ecological Indicators, Chesapeake Bay, risk assessment, EMAP, monitoring, bioindicator, molecular genetics, fundulus heteroclitus, genetic variability, human exposure, ecosystem indicators, estuarine ecosystems, aquatic ecosystems, contaminant impactProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.