Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

1999 Progress Report: The Valuation of Mortality Risk Reductions: Application of Two New Survey Instruments

EPA Grant Number: R826608
Title: The Valuation of Mortality Risk Reductions: Application of Two New Survey Instruments
Investigators: Krupnick, Alan J. , Cropper, Maureen , Simon, Nathalie , Alberini, Anna
Institution: Resources for the Future , University of Maryland - College Park , University of Colorado at Boulder
Current Institution: Resources for the Future
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2000
Project Period Covered by this Report: October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999
Project Amount: $270,000
RFA: Decision-Making and Valuation for Environmental Policy (1998) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Environmental Justice

Objective:

The purpose of this project is to estimate the willingness-to-pay for mortality risk reductions in the context appropriate to air quality improvements using contingent valuation techniques applied to a sample of individuals in the United States

Progress Summary:

The project was reinvigorated during the last 6 months after a delay, which was necessary to wait for the completion of our mortality risk valuation study in Canada. That study, with methods development funded to a small extent from the EPA grant, enabled us to significantly improve the survey instrument for use in the United States, to learn from any mistakes in conducting that survey, and to compare the results of the Canadian survey to those to come from the United States. A nearly identical survey to the Canadian survey is now being field tested in Maryland to refine random-digit-dialing protocols, decide on the appropriate incentive to pay, and test various test-room configurations.

Future Activities:

Our plan is to evaluate the field test results, set the protocol for a 1,000 person survey in Maryland, and conduct the survey in the winter of 2000, evaluating the results shortly thereafter. Then, we will decide how to reallocate the remaining survey funds, either for testing CV methods affecting the credibility of the results, or for answering more questions about the willingness-to-pay for mortality risk reductions.

Journal Articles:

No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 30 publications for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

air, risk assessment, health effects, human health, sensitive populations, dose-response, age, elderly, risk management, public policy, cost benefit analysis, nonmarket valuation, contingent valuation, willingness-to-pay, social science, epidemiology., RFA, Health, Scientific Discipline, PHYSICAL ASPECTS, Geographic Area, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Economics & Decision Making, Health Risk Assessment, Physical Processes, Risk Assessments, State, decision-making, Social Science, Ecology and Ecosystems, economic objectives, benefits assessment, valuing environmental quality, willingness to pay, compliance costs, life expectancy, mortality, mortality risks, ecosystem valuation, human exposure, dichotomous-choice, environmental values, exposure, decision analysis, economic incentives, psychological attitudes, social psychology, valuation of mortality, contingent valuation, morbidity risks, human health risk, environmental policy

Relevant Websites:

http://www.rff.org

Progress and Final Reports:

Original Abstract
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • Original Abstract
    30 publications for this project
    2 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.