Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Sampling for Wireworms

EPA Grant Number: GF9500023
Title: Sampling for Wireworms
Investigators: Simmons, Carol
Institution: Iowa State University
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: May 1, 1995 through January 1, 2000
Project Amount: $32,896
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (1995) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration , Fellowship - Ecology

Objective:

This research will focus on developing a farmer or consultant-oriented, user-friendly system of sampling for wireworms to accurately determine the population within a field. This is becoming a pressing issue because the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) that was adopted to reduce soil erosion of highly erodible cropland has expired. Many farmers will be putting their land back into production, the potential for problems with soil-insect pests, especially wireworms exists. It is this potential for outbreaks which causes environmental concern, as most of the land may be unnecessarily treated with insecticides to avoid such outbreaks. This research will be carried out through weekly sampling of three wireworm infested fields from April to October. The absolute sampling method will include soil core sampling upon which five relative sampling methods will be compared. The five relative sampling methods are as follows: 1) bait mixture traps which consist of a station approximately 10cm deep and 25 cm wide, with 1/2 cup of 1:1 corn wheat mixture; 2) a wire-mesh bait trap which will consist of a 61 cm X 7.6 cm section of hardware cloth bent into the shape of a right angle; 3) the melon baiting technique which will used by randomly placing ten melons in each study location and checking these stations on a fortnightly basis; 4) an adult sampling method which will use a TABM pheromone; and 5) pitfall trapping which will be used to measure both larval and adult populations of Elateridae. In a attempt to develop a farmer-oriented trap, 2 liter-plastic soda bottles will be used to make pitfalls. These traps will be constructed by cutting off the top of the bottle and inverting this top inside the bottle. The five sampling methods will be compared with the core procedure using regression analysis. Regression models developed with this procedure will be tested for accuracy in estimating absolute larval densities. In addition, user-friendliness of the relative methods will be assessed to develop an accurate and easy method to examine wireworm populations. The method of sampling with the highest precision for the lowest cost will be recommended for field use.

Supplemental Keywords:

RFA, Scientific Discipline, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Ecology, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Ecosystem Protection, exploratory research environmental biology, Chemistry, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, computing technology, Ecology and Ecosystems, Ecological Indicators, Agricultural Engineering, sampling methods, adult sampling, TABM pheromone, wireworms, wireworm populations, bait mixture traps, regression models, wire-mesh bait trap, agricultural environments, sampling for wireworms, soil, melon baiting technique, pitfall trapping, agriculture, examining wireworm populations, soil sampling

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 1995
  • 1996
  • 1997
  • 1998
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.