Grantee Research Project Results
Variable Porosity Radiant Burner Concept/Demonstration
EPA Contract Number: 68D00039Title: Variable Porosity Radiant Burner Concept/Demonstration
Investigators: Simpson, Marc G.
Small Business: Refractory Composites
EPA Contact: Richards, April
Phase: I
Project Period: July 1, 1990 through January 1, 1991
Project Amount: $49,459
RFA: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) - Phase I (1990) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: SBIR - Air Pollution , Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) , Air Quality and Air Toxics
Description:
A variable porosity silicon carbide ceramic foam is devel- oped for burning of fossil fuels. The concept employs bilayered radiant burner observed subsurface low NOx combustion results and analytical modelling of porous radi- ant burners to design a new material concept. Based on projected performance of 300% reduction in NOx with a factor of 2 increase in radiant efficiency is achievable. The homogeneous graded porosity material is designed to pro- hibit flashback, stabilize combustion below the hot surface and prevent mechanical failures observed in bilayered ra- diant burner materials. Cost of this exciting material con- cept is 1/2 of current radiant burners.Supplemental Keywords:
Sustainable Industry/Business, RFA, Air, Scientific Discipline, Technology for Sustainable Environment, Chemical Engineering, Engineering, Chemistry, Sustainable Environment, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, Chemistry and Materials Science, cleaner production/pollution prevention, air toxics, Environmental Engineering, acid rain precursors, radiant burners, porosity material, silicon carbide ceramic foam, nitrogren oxides (NOx), Nitrogen Oxides, NOx reduction, nitrogen oxides (Nox), low NOx, variable porosity radiant burner, acid rain, radiant burnerProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.