Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Abiotic Controls on Invasive Species and Biodiversity: Comparison of Forest and Shrubland

EPA Grant Number: R828901
Title: Abiotic Controls on Invasive Species and Biodiversity: Comparison of Forest and Shrubland
Investigators: Meixner, Thomas , Allen, Edith B. , Fenn, Mark , Poth, Mark
Current Investigators: Meixner, Thomas , Allen, Edith B. , Fenn, Mark
Institution: University of California - Riverside
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: July 15, 2001 through July 14, 2004 (Extended to June 14, 2005)
Project Amount: $448,122
RFA: Exploratory Research to Anticipate Future Environmental Issues (2000) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Aquatic Ecosystems , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration , Water

Description:

Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition rates in southern California are among the highest in North America. This same region is the habitat for numerous threatened and endangered species. N deposition may be accelerating the replacement of native vegetation by invasive species even in areas that have been set aside as endangered species preserves. Atmospheric N deposition therefore represents a threat to species preservation plans in southern California and elsewhere in the west. However, different ecosystems in southern California are responding in different ways to increases in N deposition, coastal sage scrub (CSS) is being converted into exotic annual grassland while overstory and understory communities in coniferous forests appear to be more resistant to invasion.

We propose that the reason for this differing response to N deposition is in the hydrologic properties of the two systems. The CSS is a relatively closed system due to low rates of rainfall and runoff. The coniferous forests are open due to high rates of rainfall and runoff. The CSS thus retains a greater fraction of deposition encouraging the growth of invasive weeds while the coniferous zone retains a smaller fraction of deposition and is thus less susceptible to invasion.

Approach:

We will conduct a number of studies to verify the closed versus open nature of the two systems and determine the effects of N deposition on plant composition along two N deposition gradients. We will conduct irrigation experiments to investigate the effect of increased precipitation in CSS and coniferous systems. We will determine the rates of N cycling within the CSS and coniferous systems as well as the gaseous and hydrologic fluxes of N. We will also conduct vegetation surveys across N deposition gradients in the CSS and coniferous zones to determine the prevalence of invasive species in the two systems and to quantitatively match the degree of invasion to the amount of deposition.

Expected Results:

With our hydrologic N process and vegetation studies, we hope to determine the relationship of N deposition to species loss that could be used to support regulation of the sources of atmospheric N deposition in response to endangered species issues.

Supplemental Keywords:

acid deposition, ecological effects, nitrogen oxides, terrestrial ecosystem, restoration, ecology, hydrology., RFA, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Scientific Discipline, Geographic Area, State, Forestry, Biology, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Futures, Monitoring/Modeling, Exp. Research/future, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, exploratory research, invasive species, California (CA), biodiversity, endangered species, forest, acid deposition, emerging environmental problems, extinction risk, hydrology, forests, ecological dynamics, irrigation, ecological exposure, biopollution, futures research, rainfall, nitrogen, atmospheric nitrogen, shrubland

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2002 Progress Report
  • 2003 Progress Report
  • 2004
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2004
    • 2003 Progress Report
    • 2002 Progress Report

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.