Response to Roark et al. (2013) “Influence of Subsampling and Modeling Assumptions on the USEPA Field-Based Benchmark for Conductivity”
This short communication specifically rebuts 3 analyses that were said to demonstrate that the EPA's benchmark for conductivity is biased.
Impact/Purpose
To respond to comments on an EPA product in the journal Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Citation
Cormier, S. AND G. Suter. Response to Roark et al. (2013) “Influence of Subsampling and Modeling Assumptions on the USEPA Field-Based Benchmark for Conductivity”. PM Chapman (ed.), Submitted to: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 9(4):677 - 678, (2013).