Volatilization Rates From Water To Indoor Air Phase II
This study involved the development of two-phase, dynamic mass balance models for estimating chemical emissions from washing machines, dishwashers, and bathtubs. An existing model was adopted for showers only. Each model required the use of source- and chemical-specific mass transfer coefficients. Air exchange (ventilation) rates were required for dishwashers and washing machines as well. These parameters were estimated based on a series of 113 experiments involving 5 tracer chemicals (acetone, ethyl acetate, toluene, ethylbenzene, and cyclohexane) and 4 sources (showers, bathtubs, washing machines, and dishwashers). Each set of experiments led to the determination of chemical stripping efficiencies and mass transfer coefficients (overall, liquid-phase, gas-phase), and to an assessment of the importance of gas- phase resistance to mass transfer. Stripping efficiencies ranged from 6.3% to 80% for showers, 2.6% to 69% for bathtubs, 18% to 100% for dishwashers, and 3.8% to 100% for washing machines. Acetone and cyclohexane always defined the lower and upper bounds, respectively, of these ranges.
Results for shower experiments were reasonably consistent with those reported by other researchers. An important conclusion of this study was that bathtubs may be more significant than showers with respect to human exposure to chemicals dissolved in water. Dishwashers were determined to be very effective at removing chemicals from water to air, with low but continuous emissions during operation and significant storage within the dishwasher headspace. Chemical stripping efficiencies for washing machines were observed to be highly sensitive to system operating conditions. Water temperature was an important variable that affected stripping efficiencies and mass transfer coefficients for all sources.
A set of protocols was defined for estimating emission rates for chemicals other than those used in this study. Example applications are provided and illustrate the dynamic behavior of emissions and importance of chemical properties on such emissions. The results of this study should be of value to those interested in improved tools for risk-based corrective action, human exposure to disinfection by-products and other water contaminants, or the general issue of human exposure to toxic chemicals through routine daily activities.
Additional Information
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, TABLE OF CONTENTS (PDF) (20 pp, 136 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 1 (PDF) (2 pp, 9 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 2 (PDF) (24 pp, 90 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 3 (PDF) (21 pp, 253 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 4 (PDF) (34 pp, 112 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 5 (PDF) (21 pp, 76 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 6 (PDF) (57 pp, 168 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 7 (PDF) (21 pp, 97 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 8 (PDF) (20 pp, 128 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 9 (PDF) (10 pp, 24 KB, about PDF)
- VOLATILIZATION RATES, CHAPTER 10 (REF) (PDF) (4 pp, 13 KB, about PDF)
- APPENDIX (PDF) (48 pp, 382 KB, about PDF)