Application of Equilibrium Partitioning Theory to Soil PAH Contamination (External Review Draft)
Notice - This site contains archived material(s)
Archive disclaimer
Archive
disclaimer
Archived files are provided for reference
purposes only. These files are no longer maintained by the Agency and may be outdated. For
current EPA information, go to www.epa.gov. It is EPA's policy to
support reasonable accommodation to persons with disabilities, pursuant to the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 791. If you need assistance with accessing archived files, contact
EPA's Reasonable Accommodations
or submit a request using the Contact Us form.
Abstract
In March 2004, ORD's Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center (ERASC) received a request from the Ecological Risk Assessment Forum (ERAF) to provide insight into the issue of whether equilibrium partitioning (EqP) techniques can be used to predict the toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) mixtures in field-collected soil. EqP theory, which was developed for sediments, assumes that toxicity to sediment organisms is directly proportional to the amount of unbound contaminant - in this case PAH - dissolved in sediment porewater. Therefore, if one can predict how much of the bulk sediment PAH is bound to the organic carbon on sediment particles (and, therefore, by difference calculate how much is in the porewater), then toxicity prediction can be done solely on the basis of LC50s (or, alternatively, Water Quality Criteria) derived from water-only studies.
Impact/Purpose
This study attempts to apply equilibrium partitioning theory to calculate the porewater concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination in soil.
Status
The document will be revised in accordance with any public comments. The Final document will be posted on the Internet shortly thereafter.
Citation
U.S. EPA. Application of Equilibrium Partitioning Theory to Soil PAH Contamination (External Review Draft). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-06/035A, 2006.
History/Chronology
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| Aug 2004 | An internal review draft was completed. |
| Jul 2005 | Internal review was completed and comments were addressed to produce an External Review Draft. |
| Apr 2006 | A Federal Register Notice was published to solicit public comments on the External Review Draft. |