Ambient Monitoring: Elements--critical to measuring success of efforts, including WQS attainment status; monitoring strategies and plans (where/when to monitor, and what to monitor for); fixed station networks and intensive surveys; chemical, physical, and biological analysis; laboratories and data storage systems; and trainging of staff/volunteers

<< Back   Next >>

Decisions about what, where, and when to monitor are most important, and the answers to these questions can vary depending on the purpose of the monitoring program.

For example, if the program is supposed to measure the effectiveness of the CWA's regulatory program dealing with "point sources," then monitoring should generally take place just above and just below the discharge pipes coming from such sources. In addition, it would usually make most sense to analyze for pollutants that are covered in the source's permit. On the other hand, if the aim is to get an overall picture of water quality in a state (e.g., what percentage of waters are meeting WQS), then a statistically chosen random set of sampling locations would usually be best. Moreover, the types of pollutants to be tested for would need to be broader than just those known to be coming from a particular type of discharger. Currently, state ambient monitoring programs tend to be focused on waters that the state has declared impaired or suspects is polluted.

The EPA Monitoring and Assessing Water Quality home page

<< Back   Next >>

Section 24 of 69