You are here:
EARLY INDICATORS OF NITRATE STRESS; EFFECTS TO ECOSYSTEMS OF CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO LOW DOSES OF BIOAVAILABLE NITROGEN
Citation:
Jorgensen*, E E., P. M. Mayer*, A. West, M E. Gonsoulin*, S. J. Tunnell, J. E. Clark, J. L. Parsons, D. M. Engle, AND E. C. Hellgren. EARLY INDICATORS OF NITRATE STRESS; EFFECTS TO ECOSYSTEMS OF CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO LOW DOSES OF BIOAVAILABLE NITROGEN. Nat'l. TMDL Science & Policy Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 11/2002.
Description:
Throughout the eastern United States, from the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean, bioavailable nitrogen has been falling in the rain since the industrial revolution. Bioavailable nitrogen is a limiting nutrient throughout this region. While long-term research conclusively demonstrates that exposure of soil ecosystems to large doses of bioavailable nitrogen leads to deleterious environmental impacts (e.g., eutrophication, toxic algae blooms, hypoxia, toxicity, acid rain, global climate change) that can compromise people's health and the economic vigor of communities, the potential affects of chronic exposure to lower doses of bioavailable nitrogen are unknown. However, symptoms of compromised ecosystem function that may be attributable to chronic exposure to bioavailable nitrogen are widespread; contrary to expectation, many forests routinely leach nitrogen to surface and groundwater and nitrate concentrations in estuaries perturbs aquatic food-webs and affects fisheries. These observations, among others, support the hypothesis that ecosystem function can be (and has been) deleteriously impacted by chronic exposure to low doses of bioavailable nitrogen. To investigate this, in 1998 we initiated an integrated multi-disciplinary study investigating the effects of chronic exposure of ecosystems to low doses of bioavailable nitrogen. We investigated several aspects of ecosystem response to chronic exposure to low doses of bioavailable nitrogen on sixteen 40x40-m study plots in south-central Oklahoma. Plots were manipulated in a factorial arrangement such that 4 plots each received fertilizer only (48 kg/ha/yr), herbivory manipulation only (fence), a combination of fertilizer and herbivory manipulation, or were left as controls. Herbivory was manipulated by a 2-m tall chain link fence of 2.5-cm mesh. The study includes research into soil chemistry, detritus processing, microbial activity, plant community response, and herbivore population ecology. In this nitrogen-limited system, the ability of the soil system to adapt to new nitrogen inputs was compromised after 1 year of exposure when concentrations of nitrate in the soil increased @4x. The ability of detritus pathways to process nitrogen inputs was compromised after 6 months and this tendency was increased when macroinvertebrate communities were restricted. Microbial activity was naturally limited in this system by carbon availability, but this tendency was exacerbated by additional inputs of nitrogen: further, microbial population response was not qualitatively different in soils that received small nitrogen additions vs. soils that received larger nitrogen additions. Plant invasion was effected by nitrogen application, wherein both establishment from seed and by vegetative reproduction were affected. The presence of large numbers of herbivores coincided with high concentrations of soil nitrate; equivalent to the higher concentrations observed on nitrogen amended plots. We estimate that herbivores can recirculate 30-100% of the bioavailable nitrogen deposited back into the plant and microbial pathways, thereby producing a self reinforcing positive feedback loop leading to ever greater concentrations of soil nitrate and leading eventually to increased nitrate leaching to surface and ground water. These experiments demonstrate that even the relatively small amounts of bioavailable nitrogen that are deposited in precipitation have the capacity to change multiple aspects of ecosystem nitrogen retention, sequestration, and processing. Particularly, the changes observed are always potentially deleterious in that they lead to greater concentrations of nitrate and thereby make more available for leaching to surface and groundwater. As outputs of nitrogen to the atmosphere can reasonably be expected to increase in the foreseeable decades, it is prudent to identify and develop management options now to both restore ecosystems that are already compromised and to buffer affects to ecosystems that are at risk from new nitrogen inputs. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).