You are here:
PEAK N160 OF RAT FLASH EVOKED POTENTIAL: DOES IT REFLECT HABITUATION OR SENSITIZATION?
Citation:
Dyer, R. PEAK N160 OF RAT FLASH EVOKED POTENTIAL: DOES IT REFLECT HABITUATION OR SENSITIZATION? U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/J-89/220 (NTIS PB90146101), 1989.
Description:
Flash evoked potentials recorded from awake rats contain a negative peak occurring about 160 msec after the flash (N160). This peak has been associated with a specific level of arousal, and/or habituation by various authors. The current studies attempted to determine whether changes in N160 amplitude which accompany repeated testing reflect processes associated with sensitization or habituation. his paper describes experiments in Long-Evans hooded rats which demonstrate the effects of repeated testing, varying stimulus intensity, varying stimulus frequency, and discharging an alarm bell before and during a test session. epeated testing produced increases in N160 amplitude which were greater at high than low stimulus intensities. Repeated exposure to the test chamber without flashing did not alter N160 amplitude, nor did altering stimulus rate within the range of 0.5 to 4.0 Hz. ischarging an alarm increased N160 amplitude. Taken together, the data suggest that amplitude of N160 more closely reflects sensitization to the stimulus than habituation to either the stimulus or any feature of the test situation.