You are here:
A constructed wetland for treatment of an impacted waterway and the influence of native waterfowl on its perceived effectiveness.
Citation:
McMinn, B., S. Klemm, A. Korajkic, K. Wyatt, M. Herrmann, Rich Haugland, J. Lu, E. Villegas, AND C. Frye. A constructed wetland for treatment of an impacted waterway and the influence of native waterfowl on its perceived effectiveness. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING. Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, NY, 128:48-56, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.026
Impact/Purpose:
We evaluated the treatment of a constructed variable-flow wetland for the removal of select microbial targets.
Description:
A constructed, variable-flow treatment wetland was evaluated for its ability to reduce microbial loads from the Banklick Creek, an impacted recreational waterway in Northern Kentucky. For this study, levels of traditional (Escherichia coli and enterococci measured by culture and molecular techniques) and alternative fecal indicators (infectious somatic and F+ coliphage, Clostridium spp. and Clostridium perfringens by culture), potential pathogens (molecular signal of Campylobacter spp.) as well as various microbial source tracking (MST) markers (human fecal marker HF183 and avian fecal marker GFD) were monitored during the summer and early fall through five treatment stages within the Banklick Creek Wetland. No difference in concentrations of traditional or alternative fecal indicators were observed in any of the sites monitored. Microbial source tracking markers were employed to identify sources of fecal contamination within the wetland. Human marker HF183 concentrations at beginning stages of treatment were found to be significantly higher (P value range: 0.0016–0.0003) than levels at later stages. Conversely, at later stages of treatment where frequent bird activity was observed, Campylobacter and avian marker (GFD) signals were detected at significantly higher frequencies (P value range: 0.024 to <0.0001), and both signals were strongly correlated (P = 0.0001). Our study suggests constructed wetlands are an effective means for removal of microbial contamination in ambient waters, but reliance on general fecal indicators is not ideal for determining system efficacy or assessing appropriate remediation efforts.
URLs/Downloads:
DOI: A constructed wetland for treatment of an impacted waterway and the influence of native waterfowl on its perceived effectiveness.