You are here:
Stream and River Condition Across the BLM's National System of Public Lands
Citation:
Miller, S., J. Courtwright, Steve Paulsen, Tony Olsen, AND Phil Kaufmann. Stream and River Condition Across the BLM's National System of Public Lands. National Water Quality Monitoring Conference, Tampa, FL, May 02 - 06, 2016.
Impact/Purpose:
The presentation discusses the results of the U.S. BLM application of the survey approaches developed by ORD and being implemented by the Office of Water
Description:
Meeting Abstract: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), in collaboration with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, conducted the first ever Western Rivers and Streams Assessment (WRSA), a survey of the condition of BLM streams and rivers throughout the contiguous western U.S. The WRSA was designed to answer three central questions: 1. What percentage of BLM’s streams and rivers are in good, fair or poor biological condition; 2. What is the linear extent of streams and rivers experiencing stressors such as nutrient, salinity and fine sediment loading; and 3. What is the risk posed by the observed stressors to biological condition?West-wide, preliminary results from two out of three years of sampling suggest that 30% of BLM streams and rivers are in good, 23% in fair and 47% in poor biological condition, as measured by aquatic macroinvertebrates. The degree of biological departure varied geographically, with mountainous regions having greater proportions of stream kilometers in good condition and lowland, arid regions having a greater extent of poor condition. The most ubiquitous stressors were excessive salinity, nutrient loading and reduced levels of canopy cover and instream habitat complexity. These same stressors were associated with increased risk of macroinvertebrate biological condition being in poor condition. In this talk, we will present final results for the chemical, physical and biological condition of streams and rivers across the BLM National System of Public Lands. In addition, we will assess the relative risk of chemical and physical stressors to biological condition and identify the land-uses associated with the most ubiquitous and biologically relevant stressors