You are here:
Translational Biomarkers of Neurotoxicity: A Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Perspective on The Way Forward
Citation:
Roberts, R., M. Aschner, D. Calligaro, T. Guilarte, J. Hanig, David W. Herr, T. Hudzik, A. Jeromin, M. Kallman, S. Liachenko, J. Lynch III, D. Miller, Virginia C. Moser, J. O'Callaghan, W. Slikker, Jr., AND M. Paule. Translational Biomarkers of Neurotoxicity: A Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Perspective on The Way Forward. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES. Society of Toxicology, RESTON, VA, 148(2):332-340, (2015).
Impact/Purpose:
Neurotoxicity poses a significant challenge for drug and chemical development. Driven largely by submissions for drug approvals through the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), there is growing awareness of the need for sensitive and scientific biomarkers of neurotoxicity.
Description:
Neurotoxicity has been linked to a number of common drugs and chemicals, yet efficient and accurate methods to detect it are lacking. There is a need for more sensitive and specific biomarkers of neurotoxicity that can help diagnose and predict neurotoxicity that are relevant across animal models and translational from nonclinical to clinical data. Fluid-based biomarkers such as those found in serum, plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have great potential due to the relative ease of sampling compared with tissues. Increasing evidence supports the potential utility of fluid-based biomarkers of neurotoxicity such as microRNAs, F2-isoprostanes, translocator protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1, myelin basic protein, microtubule-associated protein-2, and total tau. However, some of these biomarkers such as those in CSF require invasive sampling or are specific to one disease such as Alzheimer's, while others require further validation. Additionally, neuroimaging methodologies, including magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and positron emission tomography, may also serve as potential biomarkers and have several advantages including being minimally invasive. The development of biomarkers of neurotoxicity is a goal shared by scientists across academia, government, and industry and is an ideal topic to be addressed via the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) framework which provides a forum to collaborate on key challenging scientific topics. Here we utilize the HESI framework to propose a consensus on the relative potential of currently described biomarkers of neurotoxicity to assess utility of the selected biomarkers using a nonclinical model.
