Science Inventory

Carbon Mineralization in Two Ultisols Amended with Different Sources and Particle Sizes of Pyrolyzed Biochar

Citation:

Sigua, G., J. Novak, D. Watts, K. Cantrell, P. Shumaker, A. Szogi, AND M. Johnson. Carbon Mineralization in Two Ultisols Amended with Different Sources and Particle Sizes of Pyrolyzed Biochar. CHEMOSPHERE. Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, NY, 103:313-321, (2014).

Impact/Purpose:

Biochars are a product of pyrolysis and can be used as a soil amendment to improve soil quality, sequester carbon in soils, and protect surface and groundwater quality. In some settings, biochar has also been shown to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from soils. However, the influence of biochar properties (e.g., feedstock and particle size) on both short- and long-term carbon (C) mineralization of biochar remains unclear. In order to evaluate the effect of different sources and particle sizes of biochar on C emissions and/or stability in soils, an incubation study on C mineralization of different biochar sources and particle sizes was established using two contrasting soils (i.e., high and low native soil carbon). These soils were amended with one of two manure-based biochars (poultry litters or swine solids) or one of two lignocellulosic-based biochars (switchgrass or pine chips) which were processed into two particle sizes (dust, <0.42 mm; pellet, >2 mm). Soil type and biochar particle size had a significant effect on CO2 emission. CO2 emissions increased as biochar particle size decreased. CO2 emissions were 3-fold greater from the carbon-rich soil than from the carbon-poor soil. Biochar source also had an effect on CO2 emissions. The results of this research will have widespread utility domestically and internationally as biochar is becoming widely used as a soil amendment. Incorporating the results of this research will improve the benefits of using biochar as a soil amendment.

Description:

Biochar produced during pyrolysis has the potential to enhance soil fertility and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The influence of biochar properties (e.g., particle size) on both short- and long-term carbon (C) mineralization of biochar remains unclear. There is minimal information on the potential effects of biochar particle sizes on their breakdowns by soil microorganism, so it is unknown if the particle size of biochar influences C mineralization rate and/or stability in soils. In order to evaluate the effect of different sources and particle sizes of biochar on C loss and/or stability in soils, an incubation study on C mineralization of different biochar sources and particle sizes was established using two soils: Norfolk soil (fine loamy, kaolinitic, thermic, typic Kandiudults) and Coxville soil (fine loamy kaolinitic, thermic, Paleaquults). In separate incubation vessels, these soils were amended with one of two manure-based biochars (poultry litters, PL; swine solids, SS) or one of two lignocellulosic-based biochars (switchgrass, SG; pine chips, PC) which were processed into two particle sizes (dust, <0.42 mm; pellet, >2 mm). The amount of CO2 evolved varied significantly between soils (p ≤ 0.0001); particle sizes (p ≤ 0.0001) and the interactions of biochar source (p ≤ 0.001) and forms of biochars (p ≤ 0.0001) with soil types. Averaged across soils and sources of biochar, CO2-C evolved from dust-sized biochar (281 mg kg-1) was significantly higher than pellet-sized biochar (226 mg kg-1). Coxville soils with SS biochar produced the greatest average CO2-C of 428 mg kg-1 and Norfolk soils with PC had the lowest CO2-C production (93 mg kg-1). Measured rates of carbon mineralization also varied with soils and sources of biochar (Norfolk: PL>SS>SG≥PC; Coxville: PC>SG>SS>PL). The average net CO2-C evolved from the Coxville soils (385 mg kg-1) was about three-fold more than the CO2-C evolved from the Norfolk soils (123 mg kg-1). Our results suggest different particle sizes and sources of biochar as well as soil type can influence biochar stability.

URLs/Downloads:

ABSTRACT SIGUA.PDF  (PDF, NA pp,  50.066  KB,  about PDF)

Record Details:

Record Type:DOCUMENT( JOURNAL/ PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Product Published Date:05/01/2014
Record Last Revised:06/22/2015
OMB Category:Other
Record ID: 272091