EPA Science Inventory

RESPONSE TO ROARK ET AL. (2013) “INFLUENCE OF SUBSAMPLING AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ON THE USEPA FIELD-BASED BENCHMARK FOR CONDUCTIVITY”

Citation:

Cormier, S. AND G. Suter. RESPONSE TO ROARK ET AL. (2013) “INFLUENCE OF SUBSAMPLING AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ON THE USEPA FIELD-BASED BENCHMARK FOR CONDUCTIVITY”. PM Chapman (ed.), Submitted to: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, KS, 9(4):677 - 678, (2013).

Description:

This short communication specifically rebuts 3 analyses that were said to demonstrate that the EPA's benchmark for conductivity is biased.

Purpose/Objective:

To respond to comments on an EPA product in the journal Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Record Details:

Record Type: DOCUMENT (JOURNAL/NON-PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Completion Date: 02/12/2014
Record Last Revised: 02/12/2014
Record Created: 02/12/2014
Record Released: 02/12/2014
OMB Category: Other
Record ID: 268676

Organization:

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT