You are here:
Field Performance Of A Compacted Clay Landfill Final Cover At A Humid Site
Citation:
Albright, W. H., C. H. Benson, G. W. Gee, T. Abichou, E. V. McDonald, S. W. Tyler, AND S. A. Rock. Field Performance Of A Compacted Clay Landfill Final Cover At A Humid Site. P.J. Fox (ed.), JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA, 132(11):1393-1403, (2006).
Impact/Purpose:
To evaluate how the hydraulic properties of the compacted clay barrier layer in a final landfill cover changed over a 4-year service life.
Description:
A study was conducted in southern Georgia, USA, to evalaute how the hydraulic properties of the compacted clay barrier layer in a final landfill cover changed over a 4-year service life. The cover was part of a test section constructed in a large drainage lysimeter that allowed continuous monitoring of the water balance. Patterns in the drainage (i.e., flow from the bottom of the cover) record suggest that preferential flow paths developed in the clay barrier soon after construction, apparently in response to desiccation cracking. After four years, the clay barrier was excavated and examined for changes in soil structure and hydraulic conductivity. Tests were conducted in situ with a sealed double-ring infiltrometer and two-stage borehole permeameters and in the laboratory on hand-carved blocks taken during construction and after four years of service. The in situ and laboratory tests indicated that the hydraulic conductivity increased approximately three orders of magnitude (from ≈ 10-7 to ≈ 10-4 cm · s-1) during the service life. A dye tracer test and soil structure analysis showed that extensive cracking and root development occurred through the entire depth of the barrier layer. Laboratory tests on undisturbed specimens of the clay barrier indicated that the hydraulic conductivity of damaged clay barriers can be underestimated significantly if small specimens (e.g., tube samples) are used for hydraulic conductivity assessment. The finding also indicate that clay barriers must be protected from desiccation and root intrusion if they are expected to function as intended, even at sites in warm, humid locations.
