You are here:
Top 40 Priorities for Science to Inform US Conservation and Management Policy
Citation:
Fleishman, E., D. E. Blockstein, J. A. Hall, M. B. Mascia, M. A. Rudd, J. Scott, W. J. Sutherland, A. M. Bartuska, A. Brown, C. A. Christen, J. Clement, D. DellaSala, C. D. Duke, S. J. Fiske, H. Gosnell, J. Haney, M. Hutchins, M. L. Klein, J. Marqusee, B. R. Noon, J. Powell, S. P. Quarles, K. SATERSON, B. A. Stein, M. S. Webster, AND A. Vedder. Top 40 Priorities for Science to Inform US Conservation and Management Policy. BIOSCIENCE. American Institute of Biological Sciences, MCLEAN, VA, 61(4):290-300, (2011).
Impact/Purpose:
Our objective was to open a wider dialogue among scientists, managers, decisionsmakers, and other conservation professionals about how conservation science can better be focused to meet societal needs and desires for conservation policy and management.
Description:
We present a list of America's "Top 40" high-priority questions that, if answered, would help inform some of the most important current and future decisions about resource management in the United States