You are here:
METALS IN GROUND WATER: SAMPLING ARTIFACTS AND REPRODUCIBILITY
Citation:
Puls*, R W., D. A. Clark*, B. E. Bledsoe*, R. W. Powell, AND C J. Paul*. METALS IN GROUND WATER: SAMPLING ARTIFACTS AND REPRODUCIBILITY. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials 9(2):149-162, (1992).
Impact/Purpose:
Journal Article
Description:
Field studies evaluated sampling procedures for determination of aqueous inorganic geochemistry and assessment of contaminant transport by colloidal mobility. esearch at three different metal-contaminated sites has shown that 0.45 tm filtration has not removed potentially mobile colloids, when samples have been collected using low pumping flow rates (0.2-0.3 L/min). owever, when pumping velocities greatly exceed formation groundwater flow velocities, large differences between filtered and unfiltered samples are observed, and neither are representative of values obtained with the low flow-rate pumped samples. There was a strong inverse correlation between turbidity and representativeness of samples. Several different sampling devices were evaluated in wells (PVC) ranging in depths from 10 to 160 ft. hose devices which caused the least disturbance (i.e. turbidity) also produce the most reproducible samples irrespective of filtration. he following water quality indicators were monitored during well purging: dissolved 02,pH,Eh, temperature, specific conductance, and turbidity. ampling was not initiated until all indicators had reached steady-state (usually 2 to 3 casing volumes). n all cases turbidity was slowest to reach steady-state values, followed by dissolved oxygen and redox potential. emperature, specific conductance, and pH results were generally insensitive to well purging variations. Copy available at NTIS as PB92227479.