You are here:
USE OF THE LABORATORY RAT AS A MODEL IN ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR SCREENING AND TESTING
Citation:
Gray Jr., L E., V S. Wilson, N C. Noriega, C R. Lambright, J. R. Furr, T E. Stoker, S Laws, J M. Goldman, R L. Cooper, AND P. Foster. USE OF THE LABORATORY RAT AS A MODEL IN ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR SCREENING AND TESTING. INSTITUTE OF LAB ANIMAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 42(4):425-37, (2004).
Impact/Purpose:
To describe the screening and testing program the US Environmental Protection Agency is currently developing to detect endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
Description:
The screening and testing program the US Environmental Protection Agency is currently developing to detect endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is described. EDCs have been shown to alter the following activities: hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal [HPG] function; estrogen, androgen, and thyroid hormone synthesis; and androgen and estrogen receptor-mediated effects in mammals and other animals. The value and limitations of mammalian in vivo assays are described that involve the use of the laboratory rat, the EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee species of choice. The discussion includes the evaluation of high-priority chemicals positive in the Tier 1 Screening (T1S) battery, and of subsequent testing in the Tier 2 (T2) battery, with additional short-term screening assays proposed for use in T1.5 to eliminate any uncertainty about T1S results. Descriptions include the in vivo uterotropic assay, which detects estrogens and antiestrogens; the pubertal female assay, which assesses steroidogenesis, antithyroid activity, antiestrogenicity, and HPG function; and the Hershberger assay, which detects changes in the weight of androgen-dependent tissues in castrate-immature-male rats (antiandrogens). Of the several alternative mammalian in vivo assays proposed, a short-term pubertal male rat assay appears most promising for inclusion in T1 or T1.5. An additional in utero-lactational screening protocol is being evaluated, but appears to be better suited for T1.5 or T2 due to the size, complexity, and duration of the assay. The adult intact male assay, also proposed as an alternative for T1, attempts to identify EDCs in a hormonal battery, but has limited value as a screen due to a lack of sensitivity and specificity. For Tier 2 testing, the number of endocrine-sensitive endpoints and offspring (F1) examined in multigenerational tests must be thoughtfully expanded for EDCs on a mode-of-action-specific basis, with consideration given to tailoring T2, based on the results of T1S.