Science Inventory

The assessment and remediation of mercury contaminated sites: A review of current approaches

Citation:

Eckley, Chris S., C. Gilmour, S. Janssen, Todd P. Luxton, Paul M. Randall, L. Whalin, AND C. Austin. The assessment and remediation of mercury contaminated sites: A review of current approaches. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. Elsevier BV, AMSTERDAM, Netherlands, 707:136031, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136031

Impact/Purpose:

Remediation of mercury (Hg) contaminated sites has long relied on traditional approaches, such as containment, removal and capping.  Here we review contemporary practices in the assessment and remediation of industrial-scale Hg contaminated sites and discuss recent advances.  Significant improvements have been made in site assessment, including the use of XRF to rapidly identify the spatial extent of contamination, Hg stable isotope fractionation to identify sources and transformation processes, and solid-phase characterization (XAFS) to evaluate Hg forms.  The understanding of Hg bioavailability for methylation has been improved by methods such as sequential chemical extractions and porewater measurements, including the use of diffuse gradient in thin-film (DGT) samplers.  These approaches have shown varying success in identifying bioavailable Hg fractions and further study and field applications are needed.  The downstream accumulation of methylmercury (MeHg) in biota is a concern at many contaminated sites. Identifying the variables limiting/controlling MeHg production—such as bioavailable inorganic Hg, organic carbon, and/or terminal electron acceptors (e.g. sulfate, iron) is critical.  Mercury can be released from contaminated sites to the air and water, both of which are influenced by meteorological and hydrological conditions.  Mercury mobilized from contaminated sites is predominantly bound to particles, highly correlated with total sediment solids (TSS) and, elevated during stormflow.  Remediation techniques to address Hg contamination can include the removal or containment of Hg contaminated materials, the application of amendments to reduce mobility and bioavailability, landscape/waterbody manipulations to reduce MeHg production, and foodweb manipulations to reduce MeHg accumulated in desired species.  These approaches utilize physical, chemical, thermal and biological methods to achieve remediation goals.  Overall, the complexity of Hg cycling allows for many different opportunities to reduce/mitigate impacts which creates flexibility in determining suitable and logistically feasible remedies.

Description:

Remediation of mercury (Hg) contaminated sites has long relied on traditional approaches, such as removal and containment/capping. Here we review contemporary practices in the assessment and remediation of industrial-scale Hg contaminated sites and discuss recent advances. Significant improvements have been made in site assessment, including the use of XRF to rapidly identify the spatial extent of contamination, Hg stable isotope fractionation to identify sources and transformation processes, and solid-phase characterization (XAFS) to evaluate Hg forms. The understanding of Hg bioavailability for methylation has been improved by methods such as sequential chemical extractions and porewater measurements, including the use of diffuse gradient in thin-film (DGT) samplers.

Record Details:

Record Type:DOCUMENT( JOURNAL/ PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)
Product Published Date:03/10/2020
Record Last Revised:03/29/2022
OMB Category:Other
Record ID: 354386