Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

EPA's Report on the Environment: External Review Draft

Fish Faunal Intactness



Note to reviewers of this draft revised ROE: This indicator reflects data through 2006.

Introduction

Intactness, the extent to which ecological communities have retained their historical composition, is a critical aspect of the biological balance of the nation’s ecological systems (NRC, 2000). It is of particular importance in freshwater systems that are impacted by pollution, habitat alteration, fisheries management, and invasive species.

This indicator tracks the intactness of the native freshwater fish fauna in each of the nation’s major watersheds by comparing the current faunal composition of those watersheds with their historical composition. The indicator specifically measures the reduction in native species diversity in each 6-digit U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic unit code (HUC) cataloguing unit in the 48 contiguous states. Intactness is expressed as a percent based on the formula:

reduction in diversity = 1 - (# of current native species ÷ # of historical native species)

The native species diversity indicator proposed by the National Research Council (NRC, 2000) compared expected native species diversity (projected from species-area-curve models) with observed diversity. This “Fish Faunal Intactness” indicator makes use of empirical, rather than modeled, data sets and focuses on a well-known group of organisms with a fairly strong historical record.

Reductions in watershed diversity may be due either to the overall extinction of a species (at least 12 U.S. freshwater fish species are known to be extinct and another three species are known only from historical records and may be extinct) or, more commonly, to the extirpation of a species from selected watersheds. In the case of regional extirpations, opportunities may exist for restoring a species to watersheds in its historical range.

The fish distributional data underlying this indicator were gathered by NatureServe, a nonprofit research organization, and are derived from a number of sources, including species occurrence data from state Natural Heritage Programs, a broad array of relevant scientific literature (e.g., fish faunas), and expert review in nearly every state. Within NatureServe's database, any native species with a recorded observation before 1970 is considered part of the historical (baseline) faunal composition of a given watershed. A species is classified as "current" if there is evidence that it is still present in the watershed—for example, a recent observation. Conversely, if a species has not been observed in a given watershed for many years, experts may deem it to be no longer present. The underlying data include distributions for 782 native freshwater fish species across small watersheds (8-digit HUC). For this indicator, data were pooled and reported by larger 6-digit HUCs to reduce potential errors of omission in the smaller watersheds.

What the Data Show

Watersheds covering about one-fifth (21 percent) of the area of the contiguous U.S. appear to have fish faunas that are fully intact, retaining the entire complement of fish species that were present before 1970 (Exhibits 1 and 2). Watersheds covering nearly a quarter (24 percent) of the area, however, have lost 10 percent or more of their native fish species. Reductions in diversity are especially severe in the Southwest (e.g., the lower Colorado River watershed) and the Great Lakes, with eight major watersheds (representing 2 percent of total area) having lost at least half of their native fish species.

Some watersheds are naturally more species-rich than others, and for those with greater historical diversity, even a small percentage reduction may mean the loss of numerous species in absolute terms. Although the greatest diversity of fish species is found in the Southeast, the greatest reduction in numbers has occurred in portions of the Midwest and the Great Lakes, where several watersheds have lost more than 20 species (Exhibits 3 and 4). In contrast, southwestern HUCs have all lost 10 or fewer species, but because these watersheds historically supported fewer species, on a percentage basis their fish faunas are regarded as less intact.

Limitations

  • The incomplete historical record for freshwater fish distributions and inconsistent inventory records for contemporary fish distributions are sources of uncertainty.
     
  • Although NatureServe has attempted to compile the most complete distributional information possible for these species at the 8-digit HUC level, these data are dynamic; new records frequently are added and existing records are revised as new information is received and as taxonomic changes occur.
     

Data Sources

This indicator presents a summary of data available from the NatureServe Explorer database (NatureServe, 2006) (http://www.natureserve.org/conservation-tools/data-maps-tools/natureserve-explorer). The identity and status (current vs. historical) of all native fish species recorded in each 8-digit HUC are available from this database, along with species-by-species distribution maps at the 8-digit HUC level. Analyses based on these data have previously been reported in Master et al. (1998, 2003) and Stein et al. (2000).

For More Information


 

This page provides links to non-EPA websites that provide additional information about this topic. You will leave the EPA.gov domain, and EPA cannot attest to the accuracy of information on that non-EPA page. Providing links to a non-EPA website is not an endorsement of the other site or the information it contains by EPA or any of its employees. Also, be aware that the privacy protection provided on the EPA.gov domain (see Privacy and Security Notice) may not be available at the external link. Exit EPA Disclaimer

You will need the free Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more.


Jump to main content.