Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

EPA's Report on the Environment: External Review Draft

Population Served by Community Water Systems with No Reported Violations of Health-Based Standards



Note to reviewers of this draft revised ROE: This indicator reflects data through 2012. EPA anticipates updating this indicator in 2014.

Introduction

Community water systems (CWS) are public water systems that supply water to the same population year-round. In fiscal year (FY) 2012, more than 300 million Americans (U.S. EPA, 2012)—roughly 96 percent of the U.S. population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013)—got at least some of their drinking water from a CWS. This indicator presents the percentage of Americans served by CWS for which states reported no violations of EPA health-based standards for more than 90 contaminants (U.S. EPA, 2012).

Health-based standards include Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), Maximum Residual Disinfection Levels (MRDLs), and Treatment Techniques (TTs). An MCL is the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. An MRDL is the level of a disinfectant added for water treatment that may not be exceeded at the consumer’s tap without an unacceptable possibility of adverse health effects. A TT is a required treatment process (such as filtration) intended to prevent the occurrence of a contaminant in drinking water (U.S. EPA, 2004). TTs are adopted where it is not economically or technologically feasible to ascertain the level of a contaminant, such as microbes, where even single organisms that occur unpredictably or episodically can cause adverse health effects. Compliance with TTs may require finished water sampling, along with quantitative or descriptive measurements of process performance to gauge the efficacy of the treatment process. In general, MCL-regulated contaminants tend to have long-term rather than acute health effects, and concentrations may vary seasonally. Thus, compliance is based on averages of seasonal, quarterly, annual, or less frequent sampling.

This indicator tracks the population served by CWS for which no violations were reported to EPA annually for the period from FY 1993 to FY 2012, the latest year for which data are available. Results are reported as a percentage of the overall population served by CWS, both nationally and by EPA Region. This indicator also reports the number of persons served by systems with reported violations of standards covering surface water treatment, microbial contaminants (microorganisms that can cause disease), disinfection byproducts (chemicals that may form when disinfectants, such as chlorine, react with naturally occurring materials in water and may pose health risks), and other contaminants. The indicator is based on violations reported quarterly by states, EPA, and the Navajo Nation, who each review monitoring results for the CWS that they oversee.

What the Data Show

Of the population served by CWS nationally, the percentage served by systems for which no health-based violations were reported for the entire year increased overall from 79 percent in 1993 to 95 percent in FY 2012, the highest annual percentage (Exhibit 1). Drinking water regulations have changed in recent years. This indicator is based on reported violations of the standards in effect in any given year.

When results are broken down by EPA Region, some variability over time is evident (Exhibit 2). Between FY 1998 and FY 2012, most Regions were consistently above the national percentage. Three of the Regions were substantially below the national average over much of the period of record, but only one remained consistently below the national percentage, largely because of a small number of public water systems serving large populations.

In FY 2012, reported violations involving surface water treatment rules in large CWS were responsible for exceeding health-based standards for 4.1 million people (1.4 percent of the population served by CWS nationally) (Exhibit 3). Reported violations of heath-based coliform standards affected 8.4 million people (2.8 percent of the CWS-served population), and reported violations of the health-based disinfection byproducts standards (Stage 1) affected 2.8 million people (0.9 percent of the CWS-served population).

Limitations

  • Non-community water systems (typically small systems) that serve only transient populations such as restaurants or campgrounds, or serving those in a non- domestic setting for only part of their day (e.g., a school, hospital, or office building), are not included in population served figures.
  • Domestic (home) use of drinking water supplied by private wells is not included. Approximately 15 percent of the U.S. population get at least some of their drinking water from private wells (USGS, 2004).

  • Bottled water, which is regulated by standards set by the Food and Drug Administration, is not included.
  • National statistics based on population served can be volatile, because a single very large system can sway the results by up to 2 to 3 percent. This effect becomes more pronounced when statistics are broken down at the regional level, and still more so for a single rule.
  • Some factors may lead to overstating the extent of population receiving water that violates standards. For example, the entire population served by each system in violation is reported, even though only part of the total population served may actually receive water that is out of compliance. In addition, violations stated on an annual basis may suggest a longer duration of violation than may be the case, as some violations may be as brief as an hour or a day.
  • Other factors may lead to understating the population receiving water that violates standards. CWS that purchase water from other CWS are not always required to sample for all contaminants themselves, and the CWS that are wholesale sellers of water generally do not report violations for the population served by the systems that purchase the water.
  • Under-reporting and late reporting of violations by states to EPA affect the ability to accurately report the national violations total. For example, EPA estimated that between 2002 and 2004, states were not reporting 38 percent of all health-based violations, which reflects a decline in the quality of violations data compared with the previous 3-year period (U.S. EPA, 2008).
  • Data reviews and other quality assurance analyses indicate that the most widespread data quality problem is under-reporting of monitoring violations. Even though these violations are separate from the health-based violations covered by this indicator, failures to monitor could mask violations of TTs, MRDLs, and MCLs.

Data Sources

Data for this indicator were obtained from EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Information System (U.S. EPA, 2012) (http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/databases/drink/sdwisfed/index.cfm, http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/databases/drink/sdwisfed/pivottables.cfm). This database contains a record of violations reported to EPA by the states or other entities that oversee public water systems, along with annual summary statistics.

 

This page provides links to non-EPA websites that provide additional information about this topic. You will leave the EPA.gov domain, and EPA cannot attest to the accuracy of information on that non-EPA page. Providing links to a non-EPA website is not an endorsement of the other site or the information it contains by EPA or any of its employees. Also, be aware that the privacy protection provided on the EPA.gov domain (see Privacy and Security Notice) may not be available at the external link. Exit EPA Disclaimer

You will need the free Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more.


Jump to main content.