Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Related Topics:
EPA National Library Network
Contact Us
Search Results for the EPA National Library Catalog
Items Found: 372
Showing: Items 51 - 100
Your Search: (SUBJECT=Excavation)
Sort Results:
Publication dates (newest-oldest)
Publication dates (oldest-newest)
Title
Choose a Library:
(CTRL-CLICK for multiple libraries)
Search all libraries
Capital Group(All DC-area libraries)
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH
CCTE/GLTED Library/Duluth,MN
CEMM/ACESD Library/Narragansett,RI
CEMM/EPD Library/Athens,GA
CEMM/GEMMD Library/Gulf Breeze,FL
CPHEA/PESD Library/Corvallis,OR
Env Science Center Library/Ft Meade,MD
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC
Law Library/Washington,DC
NRMRL/GWERD Library/Ada,OK
NVFEL Library/Ann Arbor, MI
OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC
Region 1 Library/Boston,MA
Region 2 Library/New York,NY
Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA
Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA
Region 5 Library/Chicago,IL
Region 6 Library/Dallas,TX
Region 8 Technical Library/Denver,CO
Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC
Choose a Collection:
(CTRL-CLICK for multiple collections)
Search all collections
books
documents
journals
reference
audiovisual
ebooks
PREV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NEXT
Select Item
Title
Year Published
51
In-situ Treatment of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils.
1986
52
Innovative treatment technologies : semi-annual status report /
1992
53
Instructive Document for Removal of Drummed Hazardous Waste from Non-Secure Landfills.
1984
54
Integrated grouting and hydrogeology of fractured rocks in the former USSR /
1993
55
Iodine inhalation study for Project Sedan : July 6, 1962 /
1964
56
Lawrence Avenue underflow sewer system : interim report, planning and construction /
1980
57
Lower Meramec River Basin Wastewater Treatment Facilities, St. Louis, Missouri. Volume II.
1978
58
Performance Evaluation of an Innovative Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Spray-Applied Mortar for Large Diameter Wastewater Main Rehabilitation in Houston, TX.
2014
59
Proceedings.
1969
60
Project Ketch [Clinton County, Pennsylvania] : a feasibility study on creating natural gas storage with nuclear explosions /
1967
61
Record of decision : Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats superfund site, operable unit 02, Asarco Tacoma Smelter Facility, Ruston and Tacoma, Washington.
1996
62
Record of decision : East Helena smelter site process ponds operable unit, East Helena, Montana /
1989
63
Record of decision : Kerr-McGee superfund site, Caribou County, Idaho.
1995
64
Record of Decision: South Minneapolis Residential Soil Contamination Site MN000509136, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September 5, 2008.
2008
65
Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility Bayer, Inc.
2005
66
Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility PECO Energy Company Chester Facility
2005
67
Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility SPS Technologies (SPS)
2006
68
Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility University Of Virginia
2005
69
Residual waste : model state legislation /
1976
70
Response to Comments Document: Land Disposal Restrictions, Phase 4 Final Rule Promulgating Treatment Standards for Metal Wastes and Mineral Processing Wastes; Mineral Processing Secondary Materials and Bevill Exclusion Issues, Treatment Standards for Hazardous Soils, and Exclusion of Recycled Wood Preserving Wastewaters. Volume 8. Comments Related to Regulatory Impact Analysis for Newly-Identified Mineral Processing Waste Issues Raised in First Supplemental Proposed Rule (January 25, 1996).
1998
71
Sediment removal as a lake restoration technique /
1981
72
Selected Urban Storm Water Runoff Abstracts, July 1968-June 1970.
1970
73
Sloop : a study of the feasibility of fracturing copper orebodies with nuclear explosives, and the extraction of copper by in-situ leaching methods /
1967
74
State-of-the art: sand and gravel industry /
1974
75
Summary of treatment technology effectiveness for contaminated soil.
1990
76
Superfund enforcement decision document: Pepper's Steel, FL /
1986
77
Superfund Explanation of Significant Difference for the Record of Decision (EPA Region 2): DeRewal Chemical Company, Kingwood Township, Hunterdon County, NJ., December 5, 1994.
1996
78
Superfund Explanation of Significant Difference for the Record of Decision (EPA Region 3): E.I. DuPont de Nemours, Newport Landfill, DE., August 16, 1995.
1996
79
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Apache Powder Co., St. David, AZ.
1997
80
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Bailey Waste Disposal, Bridge City, TX.
1996
81
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Bendix Flight Systems Division, Bridgewater Township, PA.
1996
82
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Bendix Flight Systems Division, South Montrose, PA.
1996
83
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Brown's Battery Breaking, Shoemakersville, PA.
1996
84
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Commencement Bay, Near Shore/Tide Flats, Operable Unit 01 - Sediments & Operable Unit 05 - Source, Pierce County WA.
1997
85
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Commencement Bay, Nearshore/Tideflats, Operable Unit 2, Pierce County, WA, 7/2/1996.
1996
86
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Davis Liquid Waste, Smithfield, RI.
1997
87
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : DeRewal Chemical Co., Kingwood Township, NJ.
1997
88
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Fields Brook, (Sediment Operable Unit), Ashtabula, OH.
1997
89
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Fort Ord, OU 2, Marina, CA.
1997
90
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Koppers Co., Inc., Oroville, CA.
1995
91
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Landfill and Resource Recovery Inc., (L&RR), North Smithfield, RI.
1996
92
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Mill Creek Dump, Erie, PA.
1997
93
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : PAB Oil & Chemical Service Inc., Abbeville, LA.
1997
94
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Powell Road Landfill, Dayton, OH.
1997
95
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Powell Road Landfill, Dayton, OH.
1997
96
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Salem Acres, Salem, MA.
1997
97
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Western Processing Co., Inc., Kent, WA.
1996
98
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Westinghouse Electric Corp. (Sunnyvale), Sunnyvale, CA.
1997
99
Superfund explanation of significant difference for the record of decision : Yakima Plating Superfund Site, Yakima, WA.
1995
100
Superfund explanation of significant differences for the record of decision : Commencement Bay Near Shore/Tide Flats, Tacoma Tar Pits, WA.
1995
PREV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NEXT
Save, Print or Email Selected Records
Select Records
Selected (this page only)
Selected (across pages)
All (this page only)
All (all pages - 500 item maximum)
Select Format
Text (Brief Information)
Text (Full Information)
Endnote (Endnote Import)
ASCII delimited for EXCEL
Email Address:
(if applicable)