OLS : Record


Main Title Economics of nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and ash control systems for coal-fired utility power plants {microform} /
Author Maxwell, J. D.; Humphries, L. R.
CORP Author Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, AL. Div. of Energy Demonstrations and Technology.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab.
Publisher Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Environmental Engineering and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Place Published Research Triangle Park, NC :
Year Published 1985
Report Number EPA/600/7-85/006
Stock Number PB85-243103
OCLC Number 48645866
Subjects Air pollution control equipment; Nitrogen oxides; Sulfur oxides; Fly ash; Economic analysis; Electric power plants; Industrial wastes; Combustion products; Electrostatic precipitators; Particles; Capitalized costs; Catalysis; Flue gases; Coal fired power plants; Air pollution economics; New source performance standards; Baghouses; Limestone scrubbing; Flue gas desulfurization
Subject Added Ent Flue gases--Purification--Economic aspects; Coal-fired power plants--Economic aspects; Air--Pollution--Economic aspects
Library   Call Number Additional Info Location Date Modified
ERBD PB85-243103 NERL/ESD-LV Library/Las Vegas,NV 12/28/2001
NTIS PB85-243103 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 303 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Abstract The report gives results of an EPA-sponsored economic evaluation of three processes to reduce NOx, SO2, and ash emissions from coal-fired utility power plants: one based on 3.5% sulfur eastern bituminous coal; and the other, on 0.7% sulfur western subbituminous coal. NOx control is based on an 80% reduction from current new source performance standards (NSPS); SO2 and fly ash control are based on meeting the current NSPS. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is used for NOx control with both coals. Limestone scrubbing and a cold-side electrostatic precipitator (ESP) are used with the 3.5% sulfur coal. Lime spray dryer flue gas desulfurization (FGD) and a baghouse for particulate collection are used with one 0.7% sulfur coal; and limestone scrubbing and a hot-side ESP, with the other. The economics consist of detailed breakdowns of the capital investments and annual revenue requirements. The 3.5% sulfur coal case is highest because of the higher SO2 control costs. The case with the spray dryer and baghouse is marginally lower in cost than that with limestone scrubbing and hot-side ESP. Costs for NOx control are 25 to 50% of the total costs.
Notes "February 1985." Bibliography: p. 169-180. Microfiche.
Author Added Ent
Humphries, L. R.
Corporate Au Added Ent Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory (Research Triangle Park, N.C.) ; Tennessee Valley Authority. Division of Energy Demonstrations and Technology.
Title Ser Add Ent Research reporting series Interagency energy-environment research and development program report ;
PUB Date Free Form {1985}.
Series Title Untraced Interagency energy/environment R&D program report ; EPA-600/7-85-006
NTIS Prices PC A14/MF A01
BIB Level m
OCLC Time Stamp 20011219131635
Cataloging Source OCLC/T
Language eng
Origin OCLC
OCLC Rec Leader 01706nam 2200325Ka 45020