OLS : Record


Main Title Economics of disposal of lime/limestone scrubbing wastes : surface mine disposal and Dravo landfill processes /
Author Veitch, John D.; Steele, A. E.; Tarkington, T. W.
CORP Author Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, AL. Div. of Energy Demonstrations and Technology.;Industrial Environmental Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Publisher Tennessee Valley Authority, Office of Power, Energy Demonstrations and Technology ; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory ; National Technical Information Service [distributor,
Place Published Muscle Shoals, AL Research Triangle Park, NC Springfield, Va.
Year Published 1980
Report Number EPA 600/7-80-022; EDT-105
Stock Number PB80-187750
OCLC Number 06437344
Subjects Solid waste disposal; Fly ash; Earth fills; Mines(Excavations); Economic analysis; Limestone; Calcium oxides; Sites; Capitalized costs; Cost analysis; Air pollution control; Additives; Limestone scrubbing; Chemical treatment
Subject Added Ent Flue gases--Purification--Economic aspects--United States.; Scrubber (Chemical technology)--Economic aspects.
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library   Call Number Additional Info Location Date Modified
EJAD EPA 600/7-80-022 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 04/11/1997
EKAM EPA 600/7-80-022 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 07/07/1995
EOAD EPA 600/7-80-022 Region 8 Technical Library/Denver,CO 05/09/2011
ERAD EPA 600/7-80-022 Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 02/19/2013
ESAD EPA 600-7-80-022 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS PB80-187750 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation xxviii, 144 p. : ill., 1 map ; 28 cm.
Abstract The report gives results of economic evaluations of flyash and limestone scrubbing waste disposal in a surface mine and in a landfill after treatment with a Dravo Lime Co. chemical additive. For the base case (new 500 MW midwestern plant burning 3.5% S, 16% ash, 10,500 Btu/lb coal), capital investment for the mine disposal process is 16.0 $/kW and annual revenue requirements are 0.98 mill/kWh, compared to 20.0 $/kW and 1.44 mills/kWh for the landfill process, excluding dry flyash collection costs of 19.2 $/kW and 0.56 mill/kWh. A moderate cost reduction is obtained for mine disposal, compared to landfill disposal of the same waste, by eliminating disposal land requirements and reducing earthmoving equipment requirements. Purchasing and handling the chemical additive for the landfill process account for most of the cost differences between the two processes. Power plant size, coal sulfur and ash contents, and distance to the disposal site have major cost effects for both processes. Modular cost breakdowns show purchase and handling of fixatives, thickening, ESP units, and disposal labor to be major cost elements.
Notes Chiefly tables. "February 1980." Includes bibliographical references (p. 80-82). "EDT-105." "EPA interagency agreement no. D8-E721-BI, program element no. INE624A."
Author Added Ent
Steele, A. E.;
Tarkington, T. W.
Corporate Au Added Ent Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory (Research Triangle Park, N.C.); Tennessee Valley Authority. Division of Energy Demonstrations and Technology.
Title Ser Add Ent Research reporting series. Interagency energy-environment research and development ; EPA-600/7-80-022.
PUB Date Free Form 1980
Series Title Untraced Interagency energy/environment R & D program report ; EPA-600/7-80-022
NTIS Prices PC A08/MF A01
BIB Level m
OCLC Time Stamp 20130211170044
Cataloging Source OCLC/T
Language eng
SUDOCS Number EP 1.23/8:600/7-80-022
Origin OCLC
OCLC Rec Leader 02020cam 2200409Ia 45020