OLS : Record


Main Title Economic analysis of wet versus dry ash disposal systems /
Author Bahor, Michael P.; Ogie, Ken L.
CORP Author Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga.;Industrial Environmental Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Publisher Tennessee Valley Authority, Energy Demonstrations and Technology ; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory ; National Technical Information Service [distributor,
Place Published Chattanooga, TN Research Triangle Park, NC Springfield, Va.
Year Published 1981
Report Number TVA/OP/EDT-81/30; EPA 600/7-81-013
Stock Number PB81-223505
OCLC Number 08008948
Subjects Solid waste disposal; Fly ash; Economic analysis; Coal; Trends; Capitalized costs; Operating costs; Substitutes; Electric power plants; Air pollution; Industrial wastes; Combustion products; Coal fired power plants; Wet methods; Dry methods
Subject Added Ent Pollution control equipment--Economic aspects--United States.; Flue gases--Purification--Economic aspects--United States.; Ash disposal--Economic aspects--United States.; Coal ash.
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library   Call Number Additional Info Location Date Modified
EIAD EPA-600/7-81-013 Region 2 Library/New York,NY 02/28/1998
EJAD EPA 600/7-81-013 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 09/03/1993
EKAM EPA 600/7-81-013 Region 4 Library/Atlanta,GA 07/21/1995
EKBD EPA-600/7-81-013 Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC 02/20/2004
EOAD EPA 600/7-81-013 Region 8 Technical Library/Denver,CO 05/09/2011
ERAD EPA 600/7-81-013 Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 02/19/2013
ESAD EPA 600-7-81-013 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 10/24/1997
NTIS PB81-223505 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. NTIS 01/01/1988
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) : ill. ; 28 cm.
Abstract The report gives results of an analysis of the economics of both wet and dry methods of coal ash disposal, under a specific series of assumptions. It indicates trends in ash disposal costs and includes an evaluation of system components including: in-plant handling systems (vacuum, pressure), transportation systems (pipeline, truck, conveyor, pneumatic systems), disposal area (flat topography, narrow valley, wide valley), and environmental/engineering considerations (liner vs. no liner, compaction vs. no compaction). The effect of power plant size (300, 600, 900, 1300, and 2600 MW) was also evaluated. For each case considered, capital and first year operating and maintenance costs were calculated, then evaluated over the estimated 35-year plant life, using both present worth and total system cost analyses. Study conclusions included: of all factors considered, site topography has the greatest influence on ash disposal costs; dry disposal is the least-cost alternative for flat sites and for many valley sites; and for small plants or short hauling distances, truck transport is the least-cost alternative for dry ash disposal.
Notes "January 1981." Includes bibliographical references. "TVA/OP/EDT-81/30"--Cover. "Interagency agreement no. EPA-IAG-D5-E721BI, program element no. INE624A."
Author Added Ent
Ogle, Ken L.
Corporate Au Added Ent Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory (Research Triangle Park, N.C.); Tennessee Valley Authority. Division of Energy Demonstrations and Technology.
Title Ser Add Ent Research reporting series. Interagency energy-environmental research and development ; EPA-600/7-81-013.
PUB Date Free Form 1981
Series Title Untraced Interagency energy/environment R & D program report ; EPA-600/7-81-013
NTIS Prices PC A06/MF A01
BIB Level m
OCLC Time Stamp 20130212185326
Cataloging Source OCLC/T
Language eng
SUDOCS Number EP 1.23/8:600/7-81-013
Origin OCLC
OCLC Rec Leader 02033cam 2200421Ia 45020