Model Clearinghouse Information Storage and Retrieval System
Record Details
Use of the ADJ_U* Beta Option in the AERMET Meteorological Processor as an Alternative Model
Record No: 16-VIII-01 Last Update: 08/01/2016
EPA Region: | 8 | Fiscal Year: | 2016 | |
States: | ND | |||
Record Type: | Action | |||
Pollutants: | SO2 | Sources: | Power Plant | |
Models: | AERMOD | Urban/Rural: | Both Urban & Rural | |
Terrain: | Both High & Low | Regulations: | SIP | |
Guideline: | Guideline | Database: | Both | |
Oral/Written: | Written | Involvement: | Review and Comment | |
Subjects: | Technical Credibility of Nonguideline Techniques | |||
Comments: | ||||
Issue: EPA Region VIII is seeking concurrence with the Model Clearinghouse on the use of the BETA Adjust U* option that was a part of a modeling analysis recently received from the North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) for the Montana-Dakota Utilities Company’s R.M. Heskett Station (Heskett) facility located about 10 km northwest of Bismarck. NDDH sought permission to use the BETA Adjust U* option in a formal request sent to the Regional Administrator under 40 CFR Part 51, specifically Section 3.2.2 of Appendix W - Guideline on Air Quality Models. The formal request letter from NDDH dated June 22, 2016 and its attachment are included as part of this concurrence request package submitted by Region VIII on June 29, 2016. C/H Response: The Model Clearinghouse concurs that a reasonable justification was thoroughly documented and demonstrates that the ADJ_U* Beta option in AERMET selected for the Heskett facility modeling demonstration performs better than the default regulatory version of AERMET for the given application where high modeled concentrations are likely to occur under low wind, stable conditions. In the case of the Heskett facility, excessive 1-hour SO2 concentrations on terrain (Crown Butte) approximately 15 km from the source at elevations above the lowest effective stack height were predicted by the regulatory default version of the AERMOD Modeling System, specifically during low-wind/stable conditions when u* values were relatively small. This parallels similar excessive 1-hour SO2 concentrations predicted on distant terrain during similar low wind/stable conditions for the Region 1 Schiller and Region 3 Wagner situations. Given this model response, the Region 8 technical report and associated alternative model justification package from the NDDH, and our similar concurrences of ADJ_U* for a nearly identical circumstances that were also appropriately justified, we agree that it was appropriate for the ADJ_U* Beta option in AERMET to be considered for this regulatory modeling demonstration at the Heskett facility. While not an issue in this particular case, we continue to evaluate the potential that the use of the ADJ_U* Beta option in combination with site-specific meteorological data that includes the sigma-theta and/or sigma-w turbulence parameters may introduce a bias toward concentration underprediction and caution anyone considering the use of both the ADJ_U* Beta option and meteorological data that includes the derived sigma-theta and/or sigma-w turbulence parameters in regulatory applications without consultation and approval from the appropriate permitting authority and the respective EPA Regional Office. |
||||
Memoranda: | ||||
Memo: Model Clearinghouse Review of the Use of the ADJ_U* Beta Option in the AERMET Meteorological Processor (Version 15181) for the Montana-Dakota Utility Company’s R.M. Heskett Station Modeling Demonstration Dated: August 1, 2016 From: George Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director Air Quality Modeling Group, EPA To: Rebecca Matichuk, Environmental Scientist Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance, Air Program, Indoor Air, Transportation and Toxics Unit, EPA Region 8 Scott Jackson, Unit Chief Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance, Air Program, Indoor Air, Transportation and Toxics Unit, EPA Region 8 Memo: Request for Approval of Alternative Model: Use of Surface Friction Velocity (ADJ_ U*) Non-Regulatory Default Option in AERMET/AERMOD version 15181 Dated: June 29, 2016 From: Rebecca Matichuk, Environmental Scientist Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance, Air Program, Indoor Air, Transportation and Toxics Unit, EPA Region 8 Thru: Scott Jackson, Unit Chief Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance, Air Program, Indoor Air, Transportation and Toxics Unit, EPA Region 8 To: George Bridgers, Director of Model Clearinghouse Air Quality Modeling Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards |