Model Clearinghouse Information Storage and Retrieval System
Record Details
Use of the ADJ_U* Beta Option in the AERMET Meteorological Processor as an Alternative Model
Record No: 16-III-01 Last Update: 06/20/2016
EPA Region: | 3 | Fiscal Year: | 2016 | |
States: | MD | |||
Record Type: | Action | |||
Pollutants: | SO2 | Sources: | Power Plant | |
Models: | AERMOD | Urban/Rural: | Both Urban & Rural | |
Terrain: | Both High & Low | Regulations: | SIP | |
Guideline: | Guideline | Database: | Both | |
Oral/Written: | Written | Involvement: | Review and Comment | |
Subjects: | Technical Credibility of Nonguideline Techniques | |||
Comments: | ||||
Issue: EPA Region III is seeking concurrence with the Model Clearinghouse on the use of the BETA Adjust U* option that was a part of a modeling analysis recently received from the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) for the Herbert A. Wagner Generating Station located near the City of Baltimore. MDE sought permission to use the BETA Adjust U* option in a formal request sent to the Regional Administrator under 40 CFR Part 51, specifically Section 3.2.2 of Appendix W - Guideline on Air Quality Models. The formal request letter from MDE dated April 14, 2016 and its attachment are included as part of this concurrence request package. C/H Response: The Model Clearinghouse concurs that a reasonable justification was thoroughly documented and demonstrates that the ADJ_U* Beta option in AERMET selected for the Herbert A. Wagner Generating Station (Wagner) modeling demonstration performs better than the default regulatory version of AERMET for the given application where high modeled concentrations are likely to occur under low wind, stable conditions. In the case of the Wagner facility, excessive 1-hour SO2 concentrations on terrain at elevations above the lowest effective stack height at distances of 20 km to 34-37 km from the source were predicted by the regulatory default version of the AERMOD Modeling System, specifically during low wind/stable conditions when u* values were relatively small. This parallels similar excessive 1-hour SO2 concentrations predicted on distant terrain during similar low wind/ stable conditions for the Region 1 Schiller Station situation. Given this model response and our similar concurrence of ADJ_ U* for a nearly identical circumstance, we agree that it was appropriate for the ADJ_ U* Beta option in AERMET to be considered for this regulatory modeling application at the Wagner facility. While not an issue in this particular case, we continue to evaluate the potential that the use of the ADJ_U* Beta option in combination with site-specific meteorological data that includes the sigma-theta and/or sigma-w turbulence parameters may introduce a bias toward concentration underprediction and caution anyone considering the use of both the ADJ_U* Beta option and meteorological data that includes the derived sigma-theta and/or sigma-w turbulence parameters in regulatory applications without consultation and approval from the appropriate permitting authority and the respective EPA Regional Office. |
||||
Memoranda: | ||||
Memo: Model Clearinghouse Review of the Use of the ADJ_U* Beta Option in the AERMET Meteorological Processor (Version 15181) for the Herbert A. Wagner Generating Station Modeling Demonstration Dated: June 20, 2016 From: George Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director Air Quality Modeling Group, EPA To: Tim Leon-Guerrero, Meteorologist Office of Air Monitoring & Analysis, EPA Region 3 Alice Chow, Associate Director Office of Air Monitoring & Analysis, EPA Region 3 Memo: Concurrence Request for the use of BETA Adjust U* for the Herbert A. Wagner Generating Station near Baltimore, MD Dated: May 13, 2016 From: Timothy A. Leon Guerrero, Meteorologist Office of Air Monitoring & Analysis, EPA Region III Thru: Alice Chow, Associate Director Office of Air Monitoring & Analysis, EPA Region III To: George Bridgers, Director of Model Clearinghouse Air Quality Modeling Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards |