Model Clearinghouse Information Storage and Retrieval System
Record Details
Use of the ADJ_U* Beta Option in the AERMET Meteorological Processor as an Alternative Model
Record No: 16-I-01 Last Update: 04/29/2016
EPA Region: | 1 | Fiscal Year: | 2016 | |
States: | NH | |||
Record Type: | Action | |||
Pollutants: | SO2 | Sources: | Power Plant | |
Models: | AERMOD | Urban/Rural: | Both Urban & Rural | |
Terrain: | High Terrain | Regulations: | SIP,Redesignation,Title V Permit | |
Guideline: | Both | Database: | Both | |
Oral/Written: | Written | Involvement: | Review and Comment | |
Subjects: | Technical Credibility of Nonguideline Techniques | |||
Comments: | ||||
Issue: Region I is seeking concurrence from the Model Clearinghouse for the approval of an alternative modeling demonstration for the use of the beta adjusted surface friction velocity (ADJ_U*) modeling technique in the AERMET meteorological preprocessor. The modeling demonstration, including the ADJ_U* technique will apply to the Response to Order on Title V Petition VI-2014-04 regarding the issuance of a proposed Title V Operating Permit TV-0053 for the Schiller Station energy generating facility (Schiller Station) located in Portsmouth, NH and also to commitments made by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services in its January 5,2016 submittal under the SO2 Data Requirements Rule. C/H Response: The Model Clearinghouse concurs that a well-reasoned justification was thoroughly documented and demonstrates that the ADJ_U* Beta option in AERMET selected for the Schiller Station modeling demonstration performs better than the default regulatory version of AERMET for the given application, i.e., a tall stack located near complex terrain, where high modeled concentrations are likely to occur under low wind, stable conditions. While not an issue in this particular case, we continue to evaluate the potential that the use of the ADJ_U* Beta option in combination with site-specific meteorological data that includes the sigma-theta and/or sigma-w turbulence parameters may introduce a bias toward concentration underprediction and caution anyone considering the use of both the ADJ_U* Beta option and meteorological data that includes the derived sigma-theta and/or sigma-w turbulence parameters in regulatory applications without consultation and approval from the appropriate permitting authority and the respective EPA Regional Office. |
||||
Memoranda: | ||||
Memo: Model Clearinghouse Review of the Use of the ADJ_U* Beta Option in the AERMET Meteorological Processor (Version 15181) for the Schiller Station Modeling Demonstration Dated: April 29, 2016 From: George Bridgers, Model Clearinghouse Director Air Quality Modeling Group, EPA To: David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch, Region 1, EPA Memo: Request to approve the use of the beta alternative formulation of surface friction velocity (u•) non-regulatory default option in AERMET version 15181; alternative refined model demonstration Dated: April 7, 2016 From: Leiran Biton, Physical Scientist Air Permits, Toxics and Indoor Programs Unit Air Programs Branch, Region 1, EPA Thru: David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch, Region 1, EPA To: George Bridgers, Director of Model Clearinghouse Air Quality Modeling Group, EPA |