Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Extramural Research

Grantee Research Project Results

NCER Grantee Research Project Results

Evaluation, Assessment, and Determination of Risk to High Trophic Level Piscivores in the Mid-Atlantic: A Spatial, Biological, and Comparative Case Study of Mercury in Virginia and New England Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus) Populations

EPA Grant Number: F6C20816
Title: Evaluation, Assessment, and Determination of Risk to High Trophic Level Piscivores in the Mid-Atlantic: A Spatial, Biological, and Comparative Case Study of Mercury in Virginia and New England Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus) Populations
Investigators: Kramar, David Eldridge
Institution: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
EPA Project Officer: Just, Theodore J.
Project Period: September 1, 2006 through August 31, 2009
Project Amount: $111,172
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2006)
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Fellowship - Geospatial and Environmental Analysis , Mercury

Description:

Objective:

This research will focus on determining the current levels of mercury (Hg) in Virginia’s juvenile bald eagle population and identifying the factors that are driving those levels. Samples will be collected from distinct regions within the state, analyzed, and the results mapped in an effort to determine “at risk” areas. Mercury levels in Virginia eagles will be compared to those in Maine’s bald eagle population in an effort to address the sources of variation in two distinct regions of the eastern US.

Approach:

Blood samples will be collected from the brachial vein in the wing using 21–25 gauge butterfly needles (depending on the size of the juvenile) and 5cc vaccutainers. Analysis of blood mercury in samples will follow analytical methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Full metrics will be collected, including but not limited to weight, crop size, foot pad, and halix claw size. In addition to the morpho-metrics of the juvenile eagles, full metrics of the nest tree will be collected if that information is not currently available. Resulting mercury levels will be correlated with predominant land-cover type, foraging area (e.g., lake, river, estuarine), aspect, predominant prey type, and geographic location, and other variables still to be determined. A combination of linear and non-linear modeling techniques such as Poisson log-linear regression, geographic weighted regression, and standard linear regression, implemented in a Geographic Information System, will be used to produce a best fit model of mercury risk in the region. To compare levels between Virginia and Maine, categorical analysis and the use of odds ratios and relative risk statistics will be used.

Expected Results:

I predict that some portion of the Virginia bald eagle population will exhibit levels at or above those considered detrimental to productivity and reproductive success. The analysis of independent variables and their relationship to elevated blood mercury levels will help to determine driving factors and explain spatial patterns of blood mercury levels. This will allow for a detailed assessment of mercury risk across the state. The cross-comparative analysis between the Virginia and Maine eagle populations will provide risk assessment at a broader scale. I expect that Maine eagle population will exhibit higher percentages of mercury levels at or above the currently known safe levels.

Supplemental Keywords:

Mercury, Methyl-mercury, Bald Eagle, Virginia, Geographic Information Systems,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Geographic Area, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, mercury transport, State, Biochemistry, Environmental Monitoring, Ecological Risk Assessment, mercury uptake, Virginia (VA), bioavailability, GIS modeling, mercury cycling, bald eagle

Top of Page

The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

Jump to main content.