Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Extramural Research

Grantee Research Project Results

Grantee Research Project Results

Dynamics of Point and Non-Point Source Fecal Pollution from an Urban Watershed in Southern California

EPA Grant Number: F5A10035
Title: Dynamics of Point and Non-Point Source Fecal Pollution from an Urban Watershed in Southern California
Investigators: Surbeck, Cristiane Q.
Institution: University of California - Irvine
EPA Project Officer: Manty, Dale
Project Period: September 1, 2005 through September 1, 2008
Project Amount: $98,804
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2005)
Research Category: Academic Fellowships

Description:

Objective:

Urban runoff has been recognized as a major source of pollutants to sensitive receiving waters. This project is motivated by the observation that storm water discharged from the Santa Ana River affects coastal water quality at economically important beaches along the Pacific Ocean in southern California. The occurrence of this pollution is complex because it happens in an urban watershed, where the movement of surface water is influenced by a complex network of flood-control, water reclamation, and wastewater treatment infrastructure. In this project, we study suspended particles and fecal indicators from point and non-point sources of pollution in the Santa Ana River and tributaries.

The objective of this project is to study the occurrence patterns and transport behavior of suspended particles and fecal indicators in the Santa Ana River watershed in southern California in order to better understand how to control and treat pollution into receiving waters. Results of this project will be shared with local county authorities to facilitate the establishment of water quality standards, or TMDLs (total maximum daily loads).

Approach:

Field data will be collected during dry and wet weather from different sites in the Santa Ana River watershed and include stream discharge, rainfall, suspended particle size spectra, suspended solids, fecal indicator bacteria, fecal indicator viruses, and human viral pathogens. The data collected will undergo statistical analysis and will be interpreted based on existing knowledge of microbiology and sediment transport theory.

Expected Results:

Some expected results are the following:

  1. We will verify whether fecal indicator loadings scale as a power-law with stream discharge. This has been established at two sites within this project and will likely be confirmed at other sites in the near future. This scaling signifies that fecal indicator concentrations can be estimated if the stream discharge is known.
  2. We will provide a framework for determining whether particles in storm water runoff within rivers originate from bed erosion, bank erosion, or a combination of both.
  3. We will assess whether wastewater treatment plant disinfection processes are killing fecal indicator bacteria before discharging treated effluent or if these bacteria are only temporarily inactivated and will re-grow once reintroduced into a river system.

Supplemental Keywords:

storm water, runoff, fecal indicators, bacteria, viruses, particles, suspended solids, transport, urban watershed, point source, non-point source, pollution, receiving waters, BMP (best management practice), TMDL (total maximum daily load), bacteria re-growth, wastewater treatment plant discharge, dry weather, wet weather, sediment, microbiology,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Geographic Area, Water, Ground Water, Water & Watershed, State, Environmental Monitoring, Ecology and Ecosystems, Watersheds, fate and transport, bacteria, coastal watershed, contaminant transport, runoff, sediment transport, urban runoff, TMDL, wastewater management, urbanizing watersheds, California (CA)

Top of Page

The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

Jump to main content.