Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Extramural Research

Grantee Research Project Results

NCER Grantee Research Project Results

An Evaluation of Conservation and Limited Development Projects as a Conservation Strategy in the United States

EPA Grant Number: FP916373
Title: An Evaluation of Conservation and Limited Development Projects as a Conservation Strategy in the United States
Investigators: Milder, Jeffrey C.
Institution: Cornell University
EPA Project Officer: Zambrana, Jose
Project Period: January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006
Project Amount: $111,344
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2004)
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Fellowship - Urban and Regional Planning , Economics and Decision Sciences

Description:

Objective:

Conservation and limited development projects (CLDPs) conducted or facilitated by land trusts use revenue from limited environmentally sensitive land development to help finance land conservation. Among their potential advantages, these projects can increase funding available for conservation, help reconcile land use disputes, and promote more sustainable development patterns. To date, however, there has been little study of CLDPs as a conservation strategy, so the potential to share knowledge and improve the use of this technique remains unfulfilled. To help fill this gap, my research will examine CLDPs from around the United States to assess their effectiveness and limitations in promoting land conservation and sustainable development. The ultimate objective of this work is to develop principles about when CLDPs are likely to be a successful conservation tool, how conservation organizations can use this tool to maximum benefit, and, more generally, when and how development and conservation can be integrated in a way that protects the ecological values of a site.

Approach:

My research is proceeding in two steps. First, I am creating a database of CLDPs, completed by and with assistance from U.S. conservation organizations, to understand the range of these projects. Based on this initial survey, I will select approximately eight representative projects to study in greater detail. My research will focus on answering four specific questions regarding CLDPs: (1) how well they meet conservation goals; (2) how cost-effective they are relative to more conventional land protection techniques; (3) whether they contribute to locally desirable land use patterns; and (4) in what ways they advance or detract from the long-term conservation success of the sponsoring organization. I will answer these questions using several methods including field-based conservation assessments, financial analysis, and interviews with CLDP proponents and local stakeholders. By evaluating CLDPs in many contexts and across many different geographical and organizational settings, this work will help the conservation community improve the use of this tool.

Supplemental Keywords:

fellowship, conservation, conservation and limited development projects, sustainable development, land use, ecological value, environmentally sensitive land development,, RFA, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Scientific Discipline, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, POLLUTION PREVENTION, sustainable development, Resources Management, decision-making, Ecology and Ecosystems, Urban and Regional Planning, Economics & Decision Making, ecosystem valuation, urban planning, assessing ecosystem vulnerability, conservation and limited development projects (CLDPs), environmental decision making, decision making, cost-effective ecosystem protection, conservation, community based environmental planning, environmental policy, land development rights, changing environmental conditions, environmental protection, land use, benefits assessment, bargaining process

Top of Page

The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

Jump to main content.