Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Extramural Research

Grantee Research Project Results

NCER Grantee Research Project Results

Assessment of Critical Sociocultural and Ecological Variables for Adaptive Watershed Management

EPA Grant Number: U915009
Title: Assessment of Critical Sociocultural and Ecological Variables for Adaptive Watershed Management
Investigators: Habron, Geoffrey B.
Institution: Oregon State University
EPA Project Officer: Edwards, Jason
Project Period: January 1, 1996 through January 1, 1999
Project Amount: $102,000
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (1996)
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration , Fellowship - Ecology and Ecosystems

Description:

Objective:

The objectives of this research project are to: (1) Identify current landowner participation in watershed conservation projects; (2) Assess the spatial distribution of watershed projects; (3) Determine characteristics of participating and non-participating landowners; and (4) Determine the sociocultural, ecological, and geographic constraints to adaptive watershed management.

Approach:

Open-ended interviews with 18 agricultural landowners in the spring of 1997 led to the development of a mail survey. The survey included the Calapooya, Deer Creek, and Myrtle Creek watersheds within the Umpqua Basin near Roseburg, southwestern Oregon. The survey went was distributed to all agricultural landowners in the three watersheds in the Spring of 1998. Surveys were returned by 237 landowners (53% percent). During 1997-1998, participant- observation was used to document the role of the Umpqua Basin Watershed Council in fostering cooperative and adaptive approaches to watershed conservation. Overall findings show that farming and ranching engender a strong symbolic meaning focused on landowner independence, the importance of private property rights, aversion toward government interference, and a belief in environmental resilience. These four themes interact to structure landowners' beliefs toward and participation in conservation. The most common conservation practices are off-stream livestock water developments and rotational grazing. Logistic regression reveals that the key factors in adoption of conservation practices varied according to the type of conservation practice. However, information-seeking behavior such as sharing management decisions with a spouse is the most consistent explanatory variable. Spatial analysis using geographic information systems suggests that a suite of conservation practices is needed to achieve a conservation network of large, connected patches throughout the watersheds. The watershed council can provide a key role by reducing bureaucracy, fostering productive discussion and understanding among stakeholders, and providing financial, technical and coordination support. The key finding is that the success of watershed conservation programs depends on their ability to match ecological and social suitability. Such a match can be achieved by following an adaptive, community-based approach to watershed conservation. The main recommendation is for agencies to allow landowners the flexibility to use a diverse set of conservation practices to achieve desired ecological outcomes instead of imposing regulations or specific practices.

Supplemental Keywords:

fellowship, adaptive watershed management, landowner, watershed conservation, conservation practices., RFA, Scientific Discipline, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, Geographic Area, Water, ECOSYSTEMS, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Water & Watershed, Ecosystem/Assessment/Indicators, Ecosystem Protection, State, Resources Management, Ecological Effects - Environmental Exposure & Risk, Ecological Monitoring, Ecology and Ecosystems, Watersheds, ecosystem assessment, watershed management, watershed protection, Oregon, agricultural watershed, conservation, ecological assessment, ecosystem management, constructed wetlands, watershed assessment, land use, watershed restoration, OR

Top of Page

The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

Jump to main content.