Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

Extramural Research

Project Research Results
Grantee Research Project Results

NCER Grantee Research Project Results

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Rapid Progestin-Based Endocrine Disruption Screening Assay

EPA Contract Number: 68D02023
Title: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Rapid Progestin-Based Endocrine Disruption Screening Assay
Investigators: Fort, Douglas J.
Small Business: Fort Environmental Laboratories Inc.
EPA Contact: Manager, SBIR Program
Phase: I
Project Period: April 1, 2002 through September 1, 2002
Project Amount: $70,000
RFA: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) - Phase I (2002)
Research Category: Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration , SBIR - Monitoring

Description:

Concerns regarding the presence of endocrine disruptors in food, water, or other environmental media as well as concerns about the potential risk they pose to humans and wildlife have been growing in recent years. Passage in 1996 of the Food Quality Protection Act and Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act reflected these concerns and required the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to develop a screening program, using appropriate validated test systems and other scientifically relevant information, to determine whether certain substances may have an endocrine effect in wildlife and humans. The proposed work will result in the validation of an assay that tests substances that might disturb reproductive and developmental processes in animals by interfering with the endocrine system. The primary goal of the proposed research is to validate and commercialize the Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) model as a system for the rapid evaluation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in the workplace or the environment. Specifically, Fort Environmental Laboratories, Inc., will validate and standardize a 24-hour X. laevis assay designed to evaluate progestin-active or antiprogestin EDCs in vitro by conducting an interlaboratory validation study with a series of known mammalian EDCs, compounds found to be inactive, and chemicals with unknown activity. Because none of the currently developed EDC screening systems are capable of specifically screening for progesterone-active EDCs, the successful completion of the in vitro oocyte GVBD model development will provide the scientific community with a nonmammalian, cost-effective, rapid, and reliable method of prescreening EDCs. The ability to rapidly and cost effectively screen for and evaluate the mechanisms of EDCs is an attractive alternative to the current laborious and expensive testing systems used today. Increasing concern over the widespread finding of EDCs in the environment has dramatically increased the need for standardized assays, such as the X. laevis GVBD model, because few other progestin/antiprogestin-based in vitro assays are available today.

Supplemental Keywords:

small business, SBIR, monitoring, assay, progestin, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, germinal vesicle breakdown, Xenopus laevis, endocrine disruptors., RFA, Health, Scientific Discipline, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Environmental Chemistry, Endocrine Disruptors - Environmental Exposure & Risk, endocrine disruptors, Risk Assessments, Monitoring/Modeling, Biochemistry, Environmental Monitoring, Biology, Endocrine Disruptors - Human Health, assays, endocrine disrupting chemicals, exposure, screening assay, human exposure, screening methods, rapid screening assay, progesterone, ecological risk assessment model, assessment technology, human health risk, environmentally-caused disease

Progress and Final Reports:
Final Report

SBIR Phase II:

Validation of a Rapid Progestin-Based Endocrine Disruption Screening Assay  | Final Report

Top of Page

The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

Jump to main content.