EMSOFT User's Guide and Modeling Software (2002 Update)
Notice The latest version of EMSOFT (2002) is available below under downloads.
Through a series of menus the user is prompted for several input choices to select a calculation method, chemical data, soil properties, and layer properties. The various calculation methods include Time-Averaged Flux, Flux vs. Time, Time- and Depth-Averaged Soil Concentration, Depth-Averaged Soil Concentration vs. Time and Soil Concentration vs. Depth. The user also has the option to determine cover layer thickness; the number of contaminant layers and their corresponding thickness; and the time period for averaging flux and soil concentration.
Input variables and their effect on model output are discussed within the manual. The model assumes the following conditions 1) a steady porewater flux, 2) homogeneous soil properties, and 3) chemicals are present in dissolved form and at low concentrations. The user friendly, menu driven EMSOFT model utilizes a DOS operating system and is written in Fortran programming language.
The EMSOFT model is based on the work of Jury et al. (1990) and is used to estimate the emission flux of volatile soil contaminants to ambient air. The model includes a closed-form solution for both partitioning of a total volume soil concentration into multiple phases (i.e., sorbed-phase, aqueous-phase, and vapor-phase) as well as a solution for vapor transport of the vapor-phase contaminants to the soil surface and subsequent flux to ambient air. At the present time, the model also accounts for solute transport within the soil column including both downward flux (i.e., leaching) and upward flux (i.e., capillary rise and evaporation at the soil surface). The model does not account for subsurface transformation processes such as biodegradation, hydrolysis, redox reactions, etc. These processes can have significant effects on the availability of vapors for diffusion upward to the soil surface. In particular, biodegradation may be a significant vector for contaminant loss, especially for petroleum-based contaminants. Modeling these transformation processes and accounting for their effects on vapor-phase diffusion is difficult and perhaps beyond the present scientific understanding. These processes can be accounted for, however, by reworking the Jury flux solution to provide soil vapor concentrations as a function of depth. Comparison of these predicted depth-specific soil vapor concentrations with measured values at the same depths can then be made and the model solution altered so that the measured and modeled values coincide. In this way, the model can be calibrated for site-specific conditions.
EMSOFT input parameters include various chemical and soil properties. EMSOFT produces calculated values for 1) time averaged flux, 2) flux as a function of time, 3) time and depth averaged soil concentrations, 4) depth averaged soil concentrations as a function of time and 5) soil concentrations as a function of depth.
|May 1986||EPA published the report, Development of Advisory Levels for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Cleanup, which described a model estimating PCB emission rates from contaminated soils under four different scenarios (i.e., steady state with and without a soil cover and unsteady state with and without a soil cover).|
|Aug1993||EPA released a draft report entitled “EMSOFT: Exposure Model for Soil-Organic Fate and Transport.” This report documented a screening model that primarily ranks the relative volatilization potential of different organic chemicals. EPA also released the modeling software, called EMSOFT (version 1.0) and a related user guide.|
|Feb 1997||EPA released an update to the EMSOFT model and user guide.|
|Sep 2002||EPA released an update of EMSOFT designed to operate in a Windows environment (Version 2.01) with an updated user guide.|
This download(s) is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy.