Application of Watershed Ecological Risk Assessment Methods to Watershed Management
Notice EPA is announcing the availability of a final report titled, Application of Watershed Ecological Risk Assessment Methods to Watershed Management (EPA/600/R-06/037F), which was prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) within EPA’s Office of Research and Development (ORD). This was announced in a April 14, 2008 Federal Register Notice.
A watershed approach is frequently used to study and manage environmental resources. Ecological risk assessment (ERA) is a process for analyzing environmental problems and is intended to increase the use of ecological science in decision making in order to evaluate the likelihood that adverse ecological effects may occur or are occurring as a result of exposure to one or more stressors. Applying ERA principles at the watershed scale makes scientific information more relevant to the needs of environmental managers. Watershed ERAs are complex because addressing impacts from multiple sources and stressors on multiple endpoints presents a scientific challenge and because multiple stakeholders have diverse interests. The needs of managers and stakeholders may change, and the need to take action may require using the best available information at the time, sometimes before an ERA is completed. Therefore, at the watershed scale, flexibility on how to implement the ERA process is necessary. It is also important that risk assessors and managers interact regularly and repeatedly.
Each activity and phase of the watershed ERA process is explained sequentially in this report. Guidance on how to involve stakeholders to generate environmental management goals and objectives is provided. The processes for selecting assessment endpoints, developing conceptual models, and selecting the exposure and effects pathways to be analyzed are described. Suggestions for predicting how multiple sources and stressors affect assessment endpoints are also provided; these include using multivariate analyses to compare land use with biotic measurements. In addition, the report suggests how to estimate, describe, and communicate risk and how to evaluate management alternatives.
|1993||EPA's Office of Water, Office of Research and Development, and the Risk Assessment Forum agree to co-sponsor five watershed assessments.|
|1997||Science Advisory Board Review of planning and problem formulation reports which were completed for all five watersheds.|
|1998||EPA's Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment were developed in part - based on lessons learned from the five watershed assessments|
|2000||EPA released a workshop report on characterizing ecological risk at the watershed scale.|
|2000||EPA released the report, Gathering information for watershed ecological risk assessments: A review of ten watershed assessments|
|2001||Journal article published, Identifying sources of stress to native aquatic fauna using a watershed ecological risk assessment framework.|
|2002||EPA annouces the release of the Watershed ecological risk assessment training module.|
|2002||Journal article published, Applying ecological risk assessment principles to watershed assessment and management.|
|2002||EPA releases the report, Clinch and Powell Valley watershed ecological risk assessment.|
|2002||EPA releases the report, Ecological risk assessment for the Middle Snake River, Idaho.|
|2002||EPA releases the report, Waquoit Bay watershed ecological risk assessment: The effect of land-derived nitrogen loads on estuarine eutrophication.|
|2002||Journal article published, Diagnosing causes of native fish and mussel species decline in the Clinch and Powell River Watershed, Virginia, USA.|
|2004||Journal article published, Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts.|
|2007||Journal article published, Using ecological risk principles in a source water protection assessment .|
|2007||Journal article published, The Integration of ecological risk assessment and structured decision making into watershed management.|
This download(s) is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy.
- (83 pp, 562 KB, about PDF)