Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2744
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
A comparison of the inflammatory response of the lung to inhaled versus instilled particles in F344 rats
Author(s)
Henderson, RF; Driscoll, KE; Harkema, JR; Lindenschmidt, RC; Chang, IY; Maples, KR; Barr, EB
Year
1995
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Toxicological Sciences
ISSN:
1096-6080
EISSN:
1096-0929
Report Number
NIOSH/00225019
Volume
24
Issue
2
Page Numbers
183-197
Language
English
PMID
7737430
DOI
10.1093/toxsci/24.2.183
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1995QH46600005
URL
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/doi/10.1006/faat.1995.1022
Exit
Abstract
U.S. Department of Energy; Proctor & Gamble Company. The potential pulmonary toxicity of poorly soluble airborne dusts generated in industrial and environmental settings is often evaluated by inhalation studies in rodents. Studies using intra-tracheal instillation of particles have been suggested as a less expensive alternative. We conducted a study to compare the inflammatory response of the lung to instilled versus inhaled particles. In one study, female F344/N rats, 11-13 weeks of age, were exposed for 6 hr/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks by inhalation to 0, 0.1, 1.0, or 10 mg/m3 of either a-quartz (toxic particle) or TiO2 (relatively low toxicity particle) and the lung burdens were determined at 1 week after the end of the exposure. The lungs were evaluated by analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) at 1, 8, and 24 weeks after the end of the exposure and by histopathology at 24 weeks. In a second study, rats were exposed by instillation to the lung burdens present in the preceding study at 1 week after the inhalation exposure, and the rats were evaluated in the same manner as in the inhalation study. In general, the degree of alveolitis, as evaluated by histopathology and BALF analysis, was similar by the two methods of exposure. With lung burdens up to 750 Ág/g lung, the TiO2 elicited no changes in BALF parameters at any time by either method of exposure, nor was any histopathology observed. The BALF changes elicited by a-quartz were of approximately the same magnitude and followed the same time course by either exposure method with the lowest dose delivered to the lung by either method being a "no-effect" dose. At the highest dose, microgranulomas were observed in bronchial-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) in both sets of rats. However, the highest inhalation exposure induced pleural granulomatous lesions that were not observed in the animals instilled with "alpha"-quartz. The results indicate that the relative potentials of the two materials to produce bronchoalveolitis and granulomatous lesions in BALT could be appropriately evaluated using either intratracheal or inhalation exposures.
Keywords
DCN-225757
;
Mineral dusts
;
Quartz dust
;
In vivo studies
;
Lung burden
;
Laboratory animals
;
Inhalation studies
;
Laboratory techniques
;
Lung tissue
;
Histopathology
;
Chronic inflammation
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity