Global Change Impacts & Adaptation
Implications of Climate Change for State Bioassessment Programs and Approaches to Account for Effects (External Review Draft)
Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. The file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing archived files may contact the NCEA Webmaster for assistance. Please visit http://epa.gov/ncea to access current information.
This draft report uses biological data collected by four states in wadeable rivers and streams to examine the components of state and tribal bioassessment and biomonitoring programs that may be vulnerable to climate change. The study investigates the potential to identify biological response signals to climate change within existing bioassessment data sets; analyzes how biological responses can be categorized and interpreted; and assesses how they may influence decision-making processes. The analyses suggest that several biological indicators may be used to detect climate change effects and such indicators can be used by state bioassessment programs to document changes at high-quality reference sites.
This draft report is intended for managers and scientists working on biological indicators, bioassessment, biomonitoring, and biocriteria, particularly in the EPA’s Office of Water and Regions, and also at state agencies. The results presented in this report are based on data of aquatic insect and other invertebrates (e.g., worms, clams, and small shrimp-like organisms) collected in wadeable rivers and streams primarily in four states, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio, and Utah. This report identifies the components of state and tribal bioassessment programs that may be affected by climate change. The study investigates the potential to identify biological response signals to climate change within existing bioassessment data sets; analyzes how biological responses can be categorized and interpreted; and assesses how they may influence decision-making processes.
The ten most important findings of the report are that:
- Multi-metric indices are vulnerable to climate change
- Predictive models used in bioassessment may be less vulnerable to climate change
- Detection of climate change effects requires a specifically designed climate change monitoring network
- Reference stations are vulnerable from changes in community composition
- Vulnerability varies by location
- Reference sites need protection from other stressors
- Collecting abiotic data is also necessary
- Reference station degradation diminishes the ability to detect impairment
- Climate change may make TMDL development more difficult
- Climate change may alter designated uses and their attainability
The ultimate goals of the report are to provide a foundation for understanding the potential climatic vulnerability of bioassessment indicators and advancing the development of specific strategies to ensure the effectiveness of monitoring and management plans under changing conditions.
|Feb 2008||EPA hosted a workshop on Bioindicators and Climate Change in Crystal City, VA on Feb 19-21, 2008.|
|Aug 2009||EPA conducted an internal review of report. Then held regional workshops. See timeline on webpage: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/global/regional_shops.htm|
|Dec 2010||Published journal articles in special section of Journal of the North American Benthological Society.|
|Apr 2011||EPA released the external review draft for public review and comment.|
This download(s) is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy.