Air Quality Criteria for Lead (Second External Review Draft)
Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. The file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing archived files may contact the NCEA Webmaster for assistance. Please visit http://epa.gov/ncea to access current information.
The Clean Air Act mandates periodic review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six common air pollutants, also referred to as criteria pollutants, including lead. Under the review process, EPA's Office of Research and Development develops a criteria document -- a compilation and evaluation by U.S. EPA scientific staff and other expert authors of the latest scientific knowledge useful in assessing the health and welfare effects of the air pollutant. In this case, the Lead Criteria Document presents the latest available pertinent information on atmospheric science, air quality, exposure, dosimetry, health effects, and environmental effects of lead. In developing criteria documents, EPA must consider the advice of Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).
The newly available EHP paper reports on potentially important new analyses of NHANES III data, which are reported to show associations between relatively low (less than 10 ug/dL) concurrent blood lead levels and increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer-related mortality among the general U.S. population. EPA staff have prepared a brief paragraph (see attachment in Downloads) describing the key findings (with appropriate caveating) for proposed insertion into the epidemiology chapter (Chpt 6) of the current draft of the Lead Criteria Document along with pertinent entries for an accompanying Annex 6 table (see attachment in Downloads); and EPA staff are also considering adding allusion to the key results in the draft Lead Criteria Document's Integrative Synthesis chapter that is to be discussed by CASAC at the August 15, 2006 public teleconference. For example. since the results of the study might allow for some estimation of increased risk of cardiovascular -related mortality, it may be appropriate to reflect the study's findings in the Integrative Synthesis chapter section discussing possible public health implications
|2004||EPA begins the mandated periodic revision of the Lead Criteria Document.|
|2005||CASAC and the public review and comment on the Project Work Plan for the document. (See Related Links).|
|2005||EPA conducts peer consultative workshops in August 2005.|
|2005||EPA releases the first external review draft of the Lead Criteria Document (see Related Links).|
|2006||CASAC and the public review and comment on the first external review draft. Following this, EPA released this second external review draft.|
This download(s) is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy.