IRIS Toxicological Review of Carbon Tetrachloride (External Review Draft)
Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. The file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing archived files may contact the NCEA Webmaster for assistance. Please visit http://epa.gov/ncea to access current information.
EPA conducted a peer review of the scientific basis supporting the human health hazard and dose-response assessment of carbon tetrachloride that will appear on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database. Peer review is meant to ensure that science is used credibly and appropriately in derivation of the dose-response assessments and toxicological characterization.
|1987||EPA posts the Carbon Tetrachloride IRIS assessment on the IRIS database (RfD and cancer assessment)|
|May 2008||EPA released the external review draft for public comment. [Federal Register Notice May 21, 2008]|
|Jun 2008||EPA announces the public listening session. [Federal Register Jun 24, 2008 ]|
|Sep 2008||EPA EPA announced the external peer review meeting to be held on October 14, 2008. [Federal Register Sep 9, 2008]|
|Nov 2008||EPA released the comments from the public comment period and external review meeting.|
|Nov 2009||EPA hosted an interagency science discussion on the review of the draft Toxicological Review of Carbon Tetrachloride.|
|Mar 2010||EPA released the Toxicological Review and IRIS Summary for Carbon Tetrachloride and the interagency review draft with interagency review comments.|
Comments on the assessment may be submitted and reviewed using the e-Government Regulations.gov Web site. From the site, select Environmental Protection Agency and the keyword EPA-HQ-ORD-2008-0058 (for the docket ID) to comment on this report.
This download(s) is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination peer review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy.