Jump to main content.


Step 3: Evaluate Data from the Case

 This image is a drawing of a caddisfly larva in its case. Caddisflies are aquatic insects that are used by biologists to monitor the environmental quality of streams.


3.2.2. Evidence of Exposure or Biological Mechanism

Concept
Measurements of the biota show that relevant exposure to the cause has occurred, or that other biological mechanisms linking the cause to the effect have occurred.

Figure 3-4. Evidence of Exposure or Biological Mechanism.
Figure 3-4. Evidence of Exposure or Biological Mechanism. The candidate cause (low dissolved oxygen) of the impairment (dead fish) causes surviving fish to swim at the surface and gulp. Observations of that behavior strengthen the candidate cause and observations that surviving fish are swimming below the surface weakens the candidate cause.
(General explanation of symbols)

Examples
Consider increases in an invasive predator as a candidate cause of decreased native fish abundance. What findings support or weaken the case for increased invasive predators as the cause, based on evidence of exposure or mechanism?

Other measurements which may provide evidence of exposure or mechanism include:

How do I analyze the data?
Data relevant to evaluating exposure or a particular mechanism are analyzed by comparing measurements from impaired versus unimpaired sites. Whereas spatial/temporal co-occurrence deals only with measures of the candidate causal agent, or proximate stressor, evidence of exposure or mechanism explicitly considers surrogate measures or measures of other steps in the causal pathway. The analytical challenges inherent in evaluating spatial/temporal co-occurrence also apply here.

What evidence would support or weaken the case for a candidate cause?
Supports

Weakens

Refutes

How do I Score the Evidence?

FindingInterpretationScore
Data show that exposure or the biological mechanism is clear and consistently present. This finding strongly supports the case for the candidate cause, but is not convincing, because it does not establish that the level of exposure or mechanistic action was sufficient to cause the effect. + +
Data show that exposure or the biological mechanism is weak or inconsistently present. This finding somewhat supports the case for the candidate cause. +
Data show that exposure or the biological mechanism is uncertain. This finding neither supports nor weakens the case for the candidate cause. 0
Data show that exposure or the biological mechanism is absent. This finding strongly weakens the case for the candidate cause, but is not convincing because the exposure or the mechanism may have been missed. - -
Data show that exposure or the biological mechanism is absent, and the evidence is indisputable. This finding refutes the case for the candidate cause. R

Helpful tips


Evaluate Data from the Case: In-Depth Look | Evaluate Data from Elsewhere: In-Depth Look | Step-by-Step Guide Home Page


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.