Jump to main content.


Candidate Causes

pixel.gif
 This image is a drawing of a caddisfly larva in its case. Caddisflies are aquatic insects that are used by biologists to monitor the environmental quality of streams.


CC.8. Unspecified Toxic Chemicals

Fifty-five gallon storage barrels. Photo by Eric Vance, U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-1. Fifty-five gallon drums of chemicals, when buried or left in the open to rust, may become a ready source of toxic chemicals.

The toxicity of a substance refers to its potential to harm living organisms. Toxicity is a function of concentration and duration of exposure, and varies by species, age and condition of exposed organisms. Toxic chemicals, as considered here, are individual chemicals, mixtures of chemicals and their by-products that originate from human activities (Image CC.8-1). These are toxic chemicals that are not yet identified and are capable of adversely affecting living organisms either directly or indirectly. They may be unknown because they have not been measured or measurement is difficult (e.g., due to episodic occurrence, unique chemistry, or low concentrations). Their effects may be suspected but, because of absent or incomplete chemical monitoring data, exposure cannot be confirmed. Under these circumstances, "toxic chemicals" should be listed as a candidate cause. Note that toxic metals are treated separately, see CC.1. Metals.

CC.8.1. What to Consider When Determining if Toxic Chemicals Should be Included as a Candidate Cause

A simple generic conceptual model for unspecified toxic chemicals.
Figure CC.8-1. This model traces causal pathways of toxic chemicals from sources to impairments. Click on the diagram to go to a larger toxic chemicals figure, accompanying narrative, and links to other related diagrams.

Toxic chemicals as addressed in this module should be listed as a candidate cause when potential human sources and activities, site observations, or observed effects support portions of the pathways in the conceptual model (Figure CC.8-1).

CC.8.1.1. Checklist of Sources, Site Evidence and Biological Effects

A checklist is provided below to help you identify key data and information useful for determining whether to include toxic chemicals among your candidate causes. The title for each column links to more detailed descriptions. The list is intended to guide you in collecting evidence to eliminate or enhance support for toxic chemicals as a candidate cause. You also may be aware of other indicators of toxic chemicals; please share your insights using the comment section.

Consider listing toxic chemicals as a candidate cause based on the presence of sources and activities, site evidence, and biological effects.

Sources and Activities
  • Non-point sources from industrial, agricultural, mining, logging, urban and residential activities, and related development
  • Historical sources and landfills
  • Spills and illegal dumping
  • Point source discharges from industries, municipal treatment facilities, animal husbandry operations
Site Evidence
  • Odors, sheens, discoloration of water
  • Deposits on stream banks or bottoms
  • Abnormal levels of water quality characteristics such as pH, conductivity, hardness, or dissolved oxygen
  • Reports of past chemical spills or episodes of toxic releases, such as treatment plant failures
  • State, county records of pesticide applications, business operations
Biological Effects
  • Abrupt increases in fish or invertebrate mortality
  • Other significant community changes, such as large reductions in species richness or abundance
  • Abnormal behaviors, such as fish leaping from the water, gasping at the surface, or crowding into tributaries
  • Gross pathologies not typical of pathogens, such as tumors, deformities, or sloughing of gill tissues
  • Appearance of new parasites, disease
  • Toxic effects in tests of effluents, ambient waters or sediments

Consider contributing, modifying, and related factors as candidate causes when toxic chemicals are selected as a candidate cause. These factors can influence concentration and toxicity, and are important for understanding the dynamics of distribution and effects of toxic chemicals:

Top of Page


CC.8.1.2. Sources of Toxic Chemicals

Chemicals and water used to power-wash the exterior of a building. Source: http://www.hud.gov/images/photos/download/hud-picp-2004-hud54.jpg.
Image CC.8-2. Chemicals and water used to strip grime and paint off a building may enter ditches for easy transport to surface waters.

Humans have processed, concentrated, and released thousands of chemicals to the environment since the industrial revolution. The enactment of environmental legislation in the 1970s (e.g., Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act) reduced chemical releases, yet toxic chemicals continue to cause impairments in aquatic environments because there are:

You should consider direct inputs, transformations (e.g., photolysis, hydrolysis, metabolism), and transport mechanisms when evaluating whether to include toxic chemicals as a candidate cause. Additional investigations will normally be required to identify what toxic chemicals may be important and where they originate. Useful sources of information on toxic chemicals released to the environment may be found through the Toxics Release Inventory. Additional information is available from Web sites on hazardous waste, pesticides, Superfund sites and health related issues, among many others. Due to the difficulty of conducting effective on-site investigations, the services of specialists in aquatic toxicology and environmental chemistry are often essential for successful evaluations.

Most human activities can become a source of toxic chemicals (Images CC.8-2 and CC.8-3), so the following examples are not all inclusive. In addition, a natural setting without obvious human disturbance or activity does not preclude the possibility that toxic chemicals are causing observed effects. Contamination in undisturbed sites may be present because chemicals can be distributed over long distances in the atmosphere (Image CC.8-4), chemicals such as pesticides may be aerially applied to forests or range lands, or historic sources of toxic chemicals may be obscured over time. Generally there are two classes of source delivery: nonpoint and point.

A mechanic recycles used oil. Photo by Eric Vance, U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-3. Improper recycling of anti-freeze and oil may release of chemicals into the air and soil.
Smoke-stack air emissions. Photo courtesy U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-4. Smokestack air emissions may become nonpoint source inputs to surface waters.
Dense residential development. Photo by C.K. Racine.
Image CC.8-5. Chemicals in runoff from road and home maintenance are carried by snow melt and storms.

Industrial, agricultural, mining, logging, urban and residential activities, and related development - These land uses are all potentially non-point sources of toxic chemicals. Chemicals in smoke stack emissions can spread widely across the landscape or region (Image CC.8-4). Building materials, solvents, fuels, cleaning materials, drugs, and pesticides enter the environment in the course of regular use or operation (e.g., Images CC.8-5). Pesticides used on crops or lawns, around building foundations, or applied to reduce nuisance insects or vegetation can contaminate surface waters, particularly when used improperly (e.g., application immediately before rain events). Chemical spills on soils, improper disposal of chemicals in drains, cleaning of residences, animal husbandry operations that use various antibiotics or hormones, leaks in pipes or holding tanks, and many other potential exposure pathways can result in episodic or sustained releases of chemicals to surface waters. Hardened surfaces and storm drains facilitate chemical transport to aquatic environments (see CC.7. Flow Alteration).

Slurry is heavy in a river after a coal spill.  Photo by Suzanne Webb, University of Kentucky, http://www.geocities.com/kyriverpal/martincoky.html.
Image CC.8-6. Slurry is heavy in a river after a 2001 coal spill in Martin County, Kentucky. Contamination from such spills is often long enduring.
Polluted water coming from a pipe into a waterbody. Photo courtesy U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-7. End-of-pipe releases of effluents may contribute to chemical loads in surface waters.

Historical sources and landfills - Past industrial and commercial operations (e.g., tanning operations, slaughterhouses, lumber mills, service stations, and drycleaners) may have contaminated soils and sediments, allowing toxic chemicals to leach into surface waters through surface or subsurface pathways. Active landfills that are failing, old landfills created before current technologies, buried wastes from commercial or military operations, or lands contaminated by former smokestack emissions or transportation corridors can contribute toxic chemicals to the aquatic environment. Releases of contaminants may occur slowly over several years or, under some conditions, at high concentrations over relatively short time frames (e.g., during intense precipitation events, flooding, dredging).

Spills and illegal dumping - Spill events (Image CC.8-6) and dumping can introduce chemicals in concentrated pulses at levels that are acutely toxic to aquatic biota, or result in enduring non-point releases for chronic exposures. Even relatively non-toxic substances, such as sodium sulfate or sodium chloride, can be toxic when present at very high concentrations. When highly toxic substances are involved, the results can be far-reaching and long-lasting. These sources tend to occur in specific locations, like point sources, but are often subsequently distributed in the environment by landscape processes similar to non-point sources, potentially creating lethal episodic exposures.

Enhanced delivery from land uses - Land use changes across the landscape linked to commercial and residential development and other human activities can directly impact delivery of toxic chemicals to surface waters. These factors influence concentration and toxicity, and are important for understanding the dynamics of distribution and effects of toxic chemicals from regular commercial, residential, and agricultural activity.

Industries, municipal treatment facilities, commercial establishments, and animal husbandry operations - These point sources often discharge mixtures of chemicals directly into surface waters at specific locations (Image CC.8-7). While direct surface water discharges are normally operated under permit, accidental releases, intermittent changes in chemical composition of effluents, and/or combined sewer overflow events can contribute to long-term or temporary increases in chemical concentrations.

Top of Page


CC.8.1.3. Site Evidence that Suggests Listing Toxic Chemicals as a Candidate Cause

Polluted ditch. Photo by Eric Vance, U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-8. An impaired ditch with a sheen and sludge suggests chemical contamination.

If you observe the following evidence during site reconnaissance, or there are records of past contamination, toxic chemicals should be considered [adapted from Hunn and Schnick (1990)]:

Keep in mind that most chemicals do not leave visible signs in the environment, and the introduction of many toxic chemicals may not result in readily-detected changes in commonly-measured water quality parameters. Thus, the absence of these site observations does not preclude concerns over toxic chemicals. However, in most cases, toxic chemicals co-transport with other relatively benign materials and should be considered a potential cause when changes occur in the relationships among commonly measured parameters of water quality such as conductivity, alkalinity, and hardness (Stewart, 2001).

Top of Page


CC.8.1.4. Biological Effects that Suggest Listing Toxic Chemicals as a Candidate Cause

Dead fish in a stream channel. Photo courtesy U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-9. A fish kill.

Effects of toxic chemicals on aquatic life can be classified into one of several categories [see Hunn and Schnick (1990)]. Acutely toxic chemicals act quickly and may cause extensive mortality. Some chemicals act generally and kill both plants and animals, whereas other chemicals act specifically and may affect only plants, or only animals, or only certain life stages of some kinds of organisms. Mortality or other effects attributable to exposure to these chemicals may be rapid, progressive or lingering, especially if the chemical operates via a chain of adverse environmental changes. Sub-lethal concentrations of toxic chemicals result in more subtle changes. Although these effects are seldom detected in the field, over time they can result in reduced abundances and even local extirpation of species and changes in community structure.

Specific biological effects cannot be identified for toxic chemicals, but may be implied as a cause by certain impairments or other observed effects, especially if the observed impairment(s) are more severe than would be suggested by known, quantified stressors. Examples include:

Species that are known to be susceptible or resistant to particular classes of chemicals, by their presence or absence, can signal impact by toxic chemicals. For those chemicals with aquatic life criteria, more is known about species sensitivities (see criteria list in Table CC.8-1). Clinical signs may also be associated with fish toxicity. Some examples are listed below, followed by their potential chemical causes in parentheses (U.S. Department of Interior, 1970). Note that in some cases, similar biotic effects may be caused by other types of stressors.

A crop duster airplane spraying agricultural fields. Photo courtesy U.S. EPA.
Image CC.8-10. A crop duster airplane is spraying agricultural fields with pesticides.

Some types of behaviors suggest exposure to specific chemical classes such as pesticides (Image CC.8-10) [adapted from Hunn and Schnick (1990)]:

Top of Page


CC.8.1.5. Site Evidence that Supports Excluding Toxic Chemicals as a Candidate Cause

There are no site observations that specifically provide evidence of the absence of toxic chemicals. General reasons for excluding a candidate from the list are described in Step 2.2 of the Step-by-Step guide and in Tips for Listing Candidate Causes.

We strongly caution against using benchmarks of effects (e.g., water quality criteria) as evidence for excluding toxic chemicals from your initial list of candidate causes, because different species have different toxic chemical requirements and different sites have different naturally occurring levels of toxic chemicals.

Top of page


CC.8.2. Ways to Identify the Presence of Toxic Chemicals

Unknown toxic chemicals, by definition, are either unmeasured or inadequately measured. Aside from direct measurement for specific chemicals in the environment, related measures may be useful in determining if toxic chemicals should be considered as a candidate cause:

If tests for toxic chemicals have not been analyzed previously, other types of water analyses may suggest the presence of sources of toxic chemicals. For example, elevated ionic strength or biological oxygen demand may suggest the presence (or historical presence) of an effluent or other source.

Top of Page


CC.8.3. Literature Reviews of Toxic Chemicals as Candidate Causes of Aquatic Life Impairment

A causal analysis of toxic chemicals may benefit from information concerning the characteristic effects of commonly occurring toxic chemicals and the concentrations at which they occur, even if there is uncertainty about the identity of the specific chemicals involved. The section below discusses EPA's ambient water quality criteria documents, which provide access to high quality data and narrative summaries for many chemicals that have caused adverse effects on aquatic life. However, it is important to remember that the criteria values themselves are not indicative of the occurrence of effects or the absence of effects.

Ambient Water Quality Criteria Documents as Literature Reviews

Since the early 1980's, EPA has been developing ambient water quality criteria designed to protect aquatic organisms from harmful exposure to chemicals. The EPA's water quality criteria documents are valuable sources of exposure-response information for aquatic organisms, and each contains a comprehensive review of the aquatic toxicity literature for a particular chemical at the time of publication. The aquatic toxicity data used to derive the criteria are screened to ensure they meet certain toxicity test practices and data quality objectives. More information on how data are screened can be found in U.S. EPA (1985d). Finally, the toxicity data contained in the criteria documents are arrayed from least sensitive to most sensitive, which is useful for comparing the effects on species in the field to relative sensitivities in the laboratory. Additional attributes of EPA's water quality criteria documents include:

Since most of the toxicity data contained in the criteria documents reflect exposures to a single chemical under standardized conditions in the laboratory, caution should be exercised when comparing such data to effects on organisms in the field, because other factors may increase or decrease a chemical's toxicity in the natural environment. Older criteria documents should be supplemented by more recent publications.

Table CC.8-1, below, contains the name and source of EPA water quality criteria to protect aquatic life. Documents without links are not posted but may be ordered from Office of Water Shopping Cart Home Page.

You will need the free Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more.

Table CC.8-1. Sources of information on EPA water quality criteria for various chemicals
Chemical (pp, file size) or (report number for ordering)Year
2-Chlorophenol (PDF) (61 pp, 2.9MB) 1980
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (296 pp, 9.2MB) 1984
2,4-Dichlorophenol (PDF) (69 pp, 3.3MB) 1980
2,4-Dimethylphenol (PDF) (60 pp, 2.8MB) 1980
Acenaphthene (PDF) (50 pp, 1.4MB) 1980
Acrolein (PDF) (102 pp, 4.8MB) 1980
Acrylonitrile (PDF) (154 pp, 7.4MB) 1980
Aldrin/Dieldrin (PDF) (154 pp, 4.9MB) 1980
Aluminum (PDF) (54 pp, 1.2MB) 1986
Ammonia - 1999 Update (PDF) (153 pp, 350K) 1999
Ammonia (Saltwater) - 1989 (PDF) (67 pp, 2.1MB) 1988
Antimony (PDF) (114 pp, 5.6MB) 1980
Arsenic - 1984 (PDF) (71 pp, 3.2MB) 1984
Atrazine - 2003 Revised Draft (PDF) (178 pp, 350K) 2003
Benzene (PDF) (125 pp, 6.1MB) 1980
Benzidine (PDF) (71 pp, 3.3MB) 1980
Beryllium (PDF) (85 pp, 3.9MB) 1980
Cadmium - 2001 Update (PDF) (166 pp, 320K) 2001
Carbon Tetrachloride (PDF) (130 pp, 6.4MB) 1980
Chlordane (PDF) (67 pp, 3.1MB) 1980
Chloride - 1988 (PDF) (46 pp, 1.9MB) 1988
Chlorinated Benzenes (PDF) (216 pp, 10.2MB) 1980
Chlorinated Ethanes (PDF) (146 pp, 6.9MB) 1980
Chlorinated Naphthalene (PDF) (68 pp, 2MB) 1980
Chlorinated Phenols (PDF) (182 pp, 7.7MB) 1980
Chlorine - 1984 (PDF) (64 pp, 2.6MB) 1984
Chloroalkyl Ethers (PDF) (108 pp, 3.2MB) 1980
Chloroform (PDF) (68 pp, 3.3MB) 1980
Chlorpyrifos - 1986 (PDF) (71 pp, 3.2MB) 1986
Chromium (PDF) (113 pp, 5.5MB) 1980
Copper - 2007 Revision (PDF) (204 pp, 2.2MB) 2007
Cyanide - 1984 (PDF) (64 pp, 2.7MB) 1984
DDT (PDF) (174 pp, 8.3MB) 1980
Dichlorobenzenes (PDF) (105 pp, 3.1MB) 1980
Diazinon - 2005 (PDF) (89 pp, 350K) 2005
Dichlorobenzidine (PDF) (48 pp, 2.0MB) 1980
Dichloroethylenes (PDF) (60 pp, 2.7MB) 1980
Dichloropropane and Dichloropropene (PDF) (59 pp, 1.8MB) 1980
Dinitrotoluene (PDF) (91 pp, 4.1MB) 1980
Diphenylhydrazine (PDF) (35 pp, 1.5MB) 1980
Dissolved Oxygen, freshwater (PDF) (62 pp, 3.1MB) 1986
Dissolved Oxygen, Salt Water (PDF) (55 pp, 310K) 2000
Endosulfan (PDF) (154 pp, 7.3MB) 1980
Endrin (PDF) (102 pp, 4.6MB) 1980
Ethylbenzene (PDF) (50 pp, 2.0MB) 1980
Fluoranthene (PDF) (84 pp, 2.3MB) 1980
Haloethers (PDF) (30 pp, 1.1MB) 1980
Halomethanes (PDF) (135 pp, 6.6MB) 1980
Heptachlor (PDF) (104 pp, 5.4MB) 1980
Hexachlorobutadiene (PDF) (55 pp, 2.5MB) 1980
Hexachlorocyclohexane (PDF) (107 pp, 4.8MB) 1980
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (PDF) (99 pp, 5.2MB) 1980
Isophorone (PDF) (49 pp, 2.1MB) 1980
Lead (PDF) (158 pp, 7.7MB) 1980
Lead - 1984 (EPA#: 440/5-84-027) 1984
Mercury - 1984 (PDF) (143 pp, 6.4MB) 1984
Naphthalene (PDF) (74 pp, 1.8MB) 1980
Nickel (PDF) (101 pp, 2.5MB) 1986
Nitrobenzene (PDF) (73 pp, 2MB) 1980
Nitrophenols (PDF) (160 pp, 7.6MB) 1980
Nitrosamines (PDF) (88 pp, 4.4MB) 1980
Nonylphenol (PDF) (96 pp, 350K) 2005
Parathion (PDF) (72 pp, 1.8MB) 1986
Pentachlorophenol (PDF) (135 pp, 3.5MB) 1986
Phenol (PDF) (94 pp, 2.6MB) 1980
Phthalate Esters (PDF) (110 pp, 3.2MB) 1980
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PDF) (204 pp, 7MB) 1980
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PDF) (200 pp, 6.2MB) 1980
Selenium - 2004 Draft (PDF) (334 pp, 1.2MB) 2004
Silver (PDF) (219 pp, 7MB) 1980
Tetrachloroethylene (PDF) (59 pp, 1.6MB) 1980
Thallium (PDF) (12 pp, 0.3MB) 1980
Toluene (PDF) (94 pp, 3.1MB) 1980
Toxaphene (PDF) (92 pp, 2.5MB) 1986
Tributyltin (PDF) (138 pp, 367K) 2004
Trichloroethylene (PDF) (66 pp, 1.9MB) 1980
Vinyl Chloride (PDF) (97 pp, 2.7MB) 1980
Zinc (PDF) (165 pp, 4.8MB) 1980

Top of Page



References

Hunn, JB; Schnick, RA. (1990) Toxic substances. In: Meyer, FP; Barclay LA, eds. Field manual for the investigation of fish kills. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service. Resource Publication 177.

Stewart, AJ. (2001) A simple stream monitoring technique based on measurements of semiconservative properties of water. Environ Manag 27(1):37-46.

US Department of the Interior. (1970) Investigating fish mortalities. Washington, DC: Division of Technical Support, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, CWT-5, 1970. 21 pp.

US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (1985d) Technical support document for water quality-based toxics control. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.; EN-336.


Common Candidate Causes Home    Previous candidate cause   


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.